THE WM FILES n°50: New “Bimbo Doll“ in the making!

[BigEverything]

OK WM!
I see you!
Holy WOW this is a sexy photo shoot!

But, are the head #'s mixed up again?
Either way, she looks so hot in black/gothic makeup!!!


20a.jpg

20b.jpg

20c.jpg

It looks like they mixed the numbers up again. I hope they fix it soon because if not it will be hard to order the correct head.

[BigEverything]

Hey WM, will the bimbo head’s #s be solved on the doll vendor’s sites anytime soon? I keep seing the numbers mixed up and I don’t want to order the wrong head in the future

[ILikeSexyVoices]

Was the head numbering ever stated officially? I couldn't find it in this thread.

[mathieu242]

Was the head numbering ever stated officially? I couldn't find it in this thread.

Yeah, right here on page 35

viewtopic.php?t=167383&start=510

When the doll was officially promoted on all the vendor websites 2 weeks ago WM even posted here:

viewtopic.php?t=167383&start=630

..with the corrections noted. So you can see even on day 1 of this doll's release there was a mixup.

I know they'll correct it soon enough, but I'm still seeing vendor sites advertise the WM Bimbo doll with the wrong head # advertised.

[WM Dolls News]

Hello,

It has been decided at factory and sales management level to change the Bimbo heads numbering for practical reasons.

So from now on the numbering of the Bimbo heads is officially the following:



So this head below is Bimbo head #1 or WM #495 now:



When you order a WM#20 Bimbo Doll from a vendor, please use the official numbering that can be seen on the promo photos. Thank you.

We apologize for any confusion caused.

Ted

[Miss Barkley]

Woooooooow!!

[Streamdeals101]

It would be IDEAL if this doll can be available as a half toro with leg stumps.

Can this become available?

I'm looking for an hourglass BBW as a half torso.

[Lobo83]

it doesn't matter what anybody says but that standard face is horrendous xD

[WM Dolls News]

Hello,

It would be IDEAL if this doll can be available as a half toro with leg stumps.

It is not planned yet.

Can this become available?

Who knows? Maybe in the future?

it doesn't matter what anybody says but that standard face is horrendous xD

What head are you talking about? There is no “Standard“ head though the Bimbo #1 head (#495) is the following:



This is the Bimbo #2 head (#496):



Admittedly we went a little overboard with this one. But nobody is forced to buy it. Wm has hundreds of different heads to choose from!

Ted

[cycleingking]

Admittedly we went a little overboard with this one. But nobody is forced to buy it. Wm has hundreds of different heads to choose from!

Ted

With all due respect Ted, I would classify "overboard" as fitting them both with an ROS option. Jokes aside, It is such a tragedy at this stage of the doll industry and especially with these most amazing heads not to have ROS capability. I begged for this during the entire process. Admittedly a bit salty about this not happening. Is there any particular reason? I hope I am not being to brash, but I am genuinely curious about the strategy here?

In one of the photshoots, a teeth kit set was used. Ahem... exactly. Why not have this function built into the head itself with the added benefit of it being fully functional, not just a prop? I do hope that these heads, especially 495 receives ROS option soon. I am holding out on ordering this doll until. In my opinion, a "Bimbo" that does not give good head is no Bimbo at all

[ILikeSexyVoices]

Admittedly we went a little overboard with this one. But nobody is forced to buy it. Wm has hundreds of different heads to choose from!

While I'm not personally into that look I can attest to that some people are, so you didn't go overboard at all but basically nailed that particular look.
Older bimbos have it due to natural aging making repeated plastic surgery visible. So keep it up.

Also is the complete gallery of the photoshoots uploaded somewhere already?

[BigEverything]

Admittedly we went a little overboard with this one. But nobody is forced to buy it. Wm has hundreds of different heads to choose from!

Don’t listen to the haters! I applaud you guys for ”going a little overboard” if that is what you want to call it. The bimbo features of the doll (big lips, plastic face etc) has been anticipated by a lot of users and I’m really grateful and pleased with the final product, especially the 496 head! And I truly believe that a lot of users, including me, would like to see the bimbo head series continue cause at the moment you guys as the WM manufacturer have a leading position on the doll market!

[setevoltas]

Admittedly we went a little overboard with this one. But nobody is forced to buy it. Wm has hundreds of different heads to choose from!

Don’t listen to the haters! I applaud you guys for ”going a little overboard” if that is what you want to call it. The bimbo features of the doll (big lips, plastic face etc) has been anticipated by a lot of users and I’m really grateful and pleased with the final product, especially the 496 head! And I truly believe that a lot of users, including me, would like to see the bimbo head series continue cause at the moment you guys as the WM manufacturer have a leading position on the doll market!

I wouldn't be against seeing a few variations on the theme. Lord knows there's a ton of great concept art out there. And now that the body is in the collection, why not?

[setevoltas]

Responding to a request... some non glamour LHP shots. Prone bone position, legs crossed, from angles between overhead and eye level. Clear visual bias toward a "forward" vaginal position, but from my experience anyone average sized on up should have no problem getting to it in either this position or doggy style.

If you want an even more rear accessible vag, there is a very similar doll I would recommend, but won't name here. Feel free to PM me.

[Siliconeman]

Well, not great LHP, only acceptable.

Her LHP may be somewhat functional but it does not look good in sexy photos.

Importance of LHP was mentioned many times during design process.

Siliconeman is disappointed.