Karen Gillan is not carrying Chris Pratt on wires--it's a 35lb lifelike doll!
- KWC7000_TRL_comp_FRM_v0177.1079_R-e1678556293757.jpg (44.69 KiB) Viewed 267 times
1ms3zbS5Wu3fjrHF.mp4- (3.93 MiB) Downloaded 18 times
35 lbs
35 lbs
Wasn't sure where to post this but it's interesting what is possible.
Karen Gillan is not carrying Chris Pratt on wires--it's a 35lb lifelike doll!
Karen Gillan is not carrying Chris Pratt on wires--it's a 35lb lifelike doll!
-
SimonSays7
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 1:03 pm
- Contact:
Re: 35 lbs
Of course it's possible. And the manufacturer who makes a good doll that light will get more sales than they can handle.
-
The Doll Advocate
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1579
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2022 8:30 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: 35 lbs
The parameters for a movie set doll VS a doll were used to / expect ,are two different things.
A movie doll doesn't need to feel a particular way or look a certain way under clothes .
Just the exposed parts need be realistic .
The legs could be low density foam with a thin wire for all we know as well as the trunk.
The arms and head could be silicone shells stuffed with cotton .
I'd love a light weight doll just as much as you guys ,but I also want her to feel good against me.
A movie doll doesn't need to feel a particular way or look a certain way under clothes .
Just the exposed parts need be realistic .
The legs could be low density foam with a thin wire for all we know as well as the trunk.
The arms and head could be silicone shells stuffed with cotton .
I'd love a light weight doll just as much as you guys ,but I also want her to feel good against me.
