www.wmdolls.com

WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

WM dolls was establish on 2012, we have own production base (located center of Greater Bay Area, Guangdong, China), which is one of the most professional and the biggest factory of realistic sex dolls in the world.
As pioneered TPE used and many famous brands' dolls manufacturer, We have been focusing on customer experience, and continue to work hard to develop new functions for dolls.
We have many patents and independently developed exclusive functions, Such as Breathing feature, Ball Joints Hand Skeleton, Real Oral Sex(ROS) Head, etc.
Website: www.wmdolls.com
Studio
Asst. Manager - TDF
Asst. Manager - TDF
Posts: 13320
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 5:51 am
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Studio »

Congratulations, she looks very nice at your place

User avatar
andy1324
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by andy1324 »

beautiful girl Headless_Too, you say she is softer than your other dolls, did you get extra soft tpe?

User avatar
Headless_Too
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Headless_Too »

the living tribunal wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 2:57 am Very nice :thumbs_up:

Regarding the EVO shoulders: coming from a Kimber (August 2021) to a WM girl (had her 3 weeks), getting used to that was hard. I found the arms have to be down straight by her side to move the lower shoulder joints without moving the EVO joints upward and even then, it takes practice.
My 157b is opposite though, EVO joints are stiffer than shoulders which is how it should be. I'll just have to exercise her shoulder joints and hope they loosen up a little.
andy1324 wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 7:51 am beautiful girl Headless_Too, you say she is softer than your other dolls, did you get extra soft tpe?
Thank you. I was going to go for the extra soft option but the vendor talked me out of it. Maybe there is a level in between? She's definitely not as firm as my 157b, certainly not complaining about either one though. Could just be my imagination, there is more to this girl in height, weight, boob size; could just make things feel softer as a result?
Studio wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 4:26 am Congratulations, she looks very nice at your place
Thanks, she's fitting in very well. Definitely a keeper! haha
WM 157B head #398 & #242
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834

WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143

WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157

User avatar
andy1324
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2021 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by andy1324 »

I like how Rosemary Doll puts their personal branding on the Factory Photos. Lets you know its not just generic pictures, but its their doll. Thats a nice touch...

User avatar
Headless_Too
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Headless_Too »

andy1324 wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 10:44 am I like how Rosemary Doll puts their personal branding on the Factory Photos. Lets you know its not just generic pictures, but its their doll. Thats a nice touch...
It was, but I had to ask for pictures without it there since every one they initially sent had that sign in the way of the view. lol I'm like I'm buying a doll, not a sign! haha
WM 157B head #398 & #242
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834

WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143

WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157

User avatar
thunderkiss69
Doll Advisor
Doll Advisor
Posts: 567
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2022 8:54 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by thunderkiss69 »

Headless_Too wrote: Wed May 25, 2022 1:15 am

Thanks. Yes, boobs are super realistic. Nice little droop and the weight of them is very pleasing to the hands. The gel is amazing. LHP from behind favors the ass but it feels natural. She's got the looks, and she's functional. Missionary is very nice. The vaginal entrance could be opened up to make entry easier, but for as small as the hole is it isn't too tight and feels like you would expect. It's like a real woman in so many ways. Yeah, I'm pretty happy with her. haha

I haven't weighed her, but she's not difficult for me to move around really. She's definitely heavier than my 157b but that's to be expected. She's MUCH lighter than the Starpery Mira I had for a minute and she's wonderfully jiggly in all the right places. Butt has a nice bounce when slapped. I think they saved some weight by making the arms very thin, proportionately small compared to the legs and thighs; those are very well sculpted BTW.
Great to know, like ZZ Top once sang, I'm looking for some tush, but I'm not not a butthole guy. I do love the more closed vagina that doesn't gap and has the flaps. Flaps down when not in flight. :lol:

Looks like the 164F is on the shortlist! Thanks, Headless. :thumbs_up:
My lovely Lucia Maria Montenari (WM 159G)
Visit the girls' Instagram page.

Stupid Positivity: Expecting people to learn new things is dangerous and oppressive.

Kjacobs
Active Poster
Active Poster
Posts: 85
Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2021 1:27 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Kjacobs »

She looks great!

User avatar
ColColt
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 4156
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 11:33 am
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by ColColt »

I really like this head-which one is it? The 164F is just superb all the way around.
Attachments
164cm5ft5_F-cup_TPE_Sex_Doll_-_Keynes_(17).jpg
164cm5ft5_F-cup_TPE_Sex_Doll_-_Keynes_(17).jpg (105.97 KiB) Viewed 1286 times

Flatearther02
Apprentice
Apprentice
Posts: 14
Joined: Sat May 28, 2022 7:01 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Flatearther02 »

So pretty

User avatar
Rock13
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Posts: 8123
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:19 pm
Location: Big Sky Country
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Rock13 »

ColColt wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 5:21 pm I really like this head-which one is it? The 164F is just superb all the way around.
Looks like Head #398 to me. Check out Leatherman's thread for Stevie, Nirodha's thread for Agnés, or mine for Kendall if you want to see some owner images.
Hadleigh is a fair-skinned WM163C/#188, Harper (#124) is a medium toned WM164D, Kendall is a fair-skinned 163C/#398. All via RLSD.

Link to Hadleigh's photo thread

Link to Harper's photo thread

Link to Kendall's photo thread

Link to the H2K Ranch

Image

User avatar
ColColt
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 4156
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 11:33 am
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by ColColt »

Will do-thanks...yep, just saw yours and Agnés and it appears to be one and the same.

User avatar
Rock13
Super Moderator
Super Moderator
Posts: 8123
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:19 pm
Location: Big Sky Country
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Rock13 »

ColColt wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 8:54 pm Will do-thanks...yep, just saw yours and Agnés and it appears to be one and the same.
When I received mine with zero makeup (Kendall) she looked really young to me, mostly because she has big wide eyes and a few slightly puffy features on her face. Luckily, makeup made the difference, so I think that the factory standard makeup might prevent that.
Hadleigh is a fair-skinned WM163C/#188, Harper (#124) is a medium toned WM164D, Kendall is a fair-skinned 163C/#398. All via RLSD.

Link to Hadleigh's photo thread

Link to Harper's photo thread

Link to Kendall's photo thread

Link to the H2K Ranch

Image

User avatar
ColColt
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 4156
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 11:33 am
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by ColColt »

Rock13 wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 9:09 pm
ColColt wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 8:54 pm Will do-thanks...yep, just saw yours and Agnés and it appears to be one and the same.
When I received mine with zero makeup (Kendall) she looked really young to me, mostly because she has big wide eyes and a few slightly puffy features on her face. Luckily, makeup made the difference, so I think that the factory standard makeup might prevent that.
It always amazed me how a given head could look so different in the hands of others. I've seen the #273 look entirely different than the Mfr photos of her just by judicious use of makeup, eye color and wig change or, perhaps a head band or ear rings, etc. Voice your choice, I suppose. That's what it's all about.

User avatar
Headless_Too
Active Member
Active Member
Posts: 160
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2022 2:34 pm
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by Headless_Too »

ColColt wrote: Sat May 28, 2022 5:21 pm I really like this head-which one is it? The 164F is just superb all the way around.
As others have mentioned, yes, it is head 398. Have 2 of them now. :mrgreen:
WM 157B head #398 & #242
viewtopic.php?f=215&t=150834

WM 164F head #398 & #423
viewtopic.php?p=2144143#p2144143

WM 164J head #39 & #59
viewtopic.php?p=2290157#p2290157

User avatar
ColColt
Doll Patriarch
Doll Patriarch
Posts: 4156
Joined: Mon May 28, 2018 11:33 am
Contact:

Re: WM 164 F From Rosemary Doll

Post by ColColt »

Headless-Got to wondering about this. What size panties for her...maybe a size 4 womens?

Post Reply

INFORMATIONS