The Doll Forum

Nice!

King Solo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 3:32 pm They're most definitely going to have to do more REVEALING photo shoots with her, before any TDF members are convinced... That's for sure

I bet that the 165N is still bad and they have not corrected it.
And 161J is the same as 161L ???

Even more confusing

Sili

Siliconeman wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:15 pm


And 161J is the same as 161L ???

Even more confusing

Sili

_____________________________

The 161J and the 161L are the same.
Attached are the 2 specification photos:

Anthony

It's a tragedy what 6YE and this vendor deliver, absolutely not trustworthy. Both obviously have no interrest in an explanation .

Mamilla wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:48 am NLcup.JPG

What model is this 165N or 161L?!

Such crap that they released that promo shoot and implied it had the 161s LHP. All we can do is get the word out and hope buyers do their research.

A huge shame whats going on with the 165 N of 6ye, as her sculpt is beautiful and quite unique

Poor lads whom purchase her without knowing in advanced about the LHP issue

That's just pure laziness..... It can't be that difficult to recreate the mold for the 165N, with the correct LHP.

They clearly see that it would sale and probably even out sale the 161J if they took the time and ACTUALLY redesigned it. But nope, they want to still try and push that defected mold onto unsuspected buyers until it ruins the reputation of the whole brand....smh.

If 6YE put any real effort into marketing they'd give WM a run for the money. The TPE is second to none and the skeletons are built to survive Armageddon.

To be fair, there isn't a single manufacturer that has put serious effort into going back and redesigning their older forward facing molds. Which is really a shame. The list of classic dolls that deserve such treatment is a long one.

Definitely an amazingly shaped doll but yeah, no money until it is certain that it can be properly banged like a legit mom bod should be banged lol

https://www.6yedollglobal.com/store/c52 ... up-Premium
I'm gonna say the first one is an updated 165N and the second one is a 161J.

Probably a mix-up throwing those both in the new 161L cup category.

Edit: but yes I agree, lets see 6YE respond with all the facts and a video tour WM Doll style.

Mamilla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 6:51 am https://www.6yedollglobal.com/store/c52 ... up-Premium
I'm gonna say the first one is an updated 165N and the second one is a 161J.

Probably a mix-up throwing those both in the new 161L cup category.

Edit: but yes I agree, lets see 6YE respond with all the facts and a video tour WM Doll style.

Hi!

This picture is grabbed from the 6Ye site. You can clearly see that 165N love hole placement is not updated. I think that 165N was never updated and it was just a rumour accidentally started up by a member who had received wrong factory pictures. The pictures wrongly showing the 161J's perfect LHP in stead of 165N. That is my theory and I will stick to it until more evidence surfaces!

Cheers!

Sili

The 6YE 165N has definitely had two molds made. The original has bad LHP, but overall, the body looks good when standing up. It’s only when put in a sex position that the whole LHP moves way too forward.

The second 165N is far worse. It’s like they added extra TPE to make the crotch sag lower. Even when standing up it looks awful and ugly. And when put in a sex position the LHP isn’t just too forward, it looks like this gross excess of sagging flesh with sad looking orifices tacked on as an after thought.

The few times I’ve seen LHP corrected on a doll, it’s at the expense of butt cleavage.

It’s a shame because the 165N has both, an idealized body but also realistic musculature. The ultimate biG tit, big booty doll with a human sized waist. Just not a human placed vagina.

6YE has another thick bodied, mostly realistic doll but it also suffers from saggy crotch. I don’t know what’s going on at the design department. It’s a 170-something.

Siliconeman wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 11:03 pm
Hi!

This picture is grabbed from the 6Ye site. You can clearly see that 165N love hole placement is not updated. I think that 165N was never updated and it was just a rumour accidentally started up by a member who had received wrong factory pictures. The pictures wrongly showing the 161J's perfect LHP in stead of 165N. That is my theory and I will stick to it until more evidence surfaces!

Cheers!

Sili
165N_LHP.jpg

That's probably the first ever pic taken of the 165N it still has the ugly butt creases. We are all guessing here until we get an answer, but showing old photos and saying the body didn't get updated is like showing an old picture of yourself claiming you never aged.

Jets Fan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:13 am
It’s a shame because the 165N has both, an idealized body but also realistic musculature. The ultimate biG tit, big booty doll with a human sized waist. Just not a human placed vagina.

Couldn't agree more. Kinda thankful they fuck so much stuff up. Kept me from spending my money
Another thick model is from the company we do not talk about 159.. super hot but bad LHP.