New Giant Mama Doll 165N

Intrigued628 · Post by **Intrigued628** » Tue Apr 26, 2022 4:11 pm

Nice!

Anthony191 · Post by **Anthony191** » Tue Apr 26, 2022 6:02 pm

That model on this thread is the 6YE Premium 161 J-Cup. I know that doll real well.

I guess renaming an old model is one way to boost sales in terms of generating more income. An old sales tactic.

Either way - buyer beware…..

I highlighted the specs on the similarities of these 2 models on both the vendor and the manufacturer’s site.

Anyway….. I’m not just a customer - I’m also an owner of this doll.
Here’s my lovely 6YE 161 J-Cup “Venus”

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:15 pm

King Solo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 3:32 pm They're most definitely going to have to do more REVEALING photo shoots with her, before any TDF members are convinced... That's for sure

I bet that the 165N is still bad and they have not corrected it.
And 161J is the same as 161L ???

Even more confusing

Sili

Anthony191 · Post by **Anthony191** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 8:57 am

Siliconeman wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:15 pm

And 161J is the same as 161L ???

Even more confusing

Sili

_____________________________

The 161J and the 161L are the same.
Attached are the 2 specification photos:

Anthony

sophiahugeboobs · Post by **sophiahugeboobs** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 10:16 am

It's a tragedy what 6YE and this vendor deliver, absolutely not trustworthy. Both obviously have no interrest in an explanation

.

Post by **setevoltas** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:15 pm

Mamilla wrote: ↑Mon Apr 25, 2022 10:48 am NLcup.JPG

What model is this 165N or 161L?!

Such crap that they released that promo shoot and implied it had the 161s LHP. All we can do is get the word out and hope buyers do their research.

Aglooka · Post by **Aglooka** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:49 pm

A huge shame whats going on with the 165 N of 6ye, as her sculpt is beautiful and quite unique

Poor lads whom purchase her without knowing in advanced about the LHP issue

King Solo · Post by **King Solo** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 1:49 pm

That's just pure laziness..... It can't be that difficult to recreate the mold for the 165N, with the correct LHP.

They clearly see that it would sale and probably even out sale the 161J if they took the time and ACTUALLY redesigned it. But nope, they want to still try and push that defected mold onto unsuspected buyers until it ruins the reputation of the whole brand....smh.

Post by **setevoltas** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 3:17 pm

If 6YE put any real effort into marketing they'd give WM a run for the money. The TPE is second to none and the skeletons are built to survive Armageddon.

To be fair, there isn't a single manufacturer that has put serious effort into going back and redesigning their older forward facing molds. Which is really a shame. The list of classic dolls that deserve such treatment is a long one.

tuffluv88 · Post by **tuffluv88** » Wed Apr 27, 2022 5:29 pm

Definitely an amazingly shaped doll but yeah, no money until it is certain that it can be properly banged like a legit mom bod should be banged lol

Mamilla · Post by **Mamilla** » Thu Apr 28, 2022 6:51 am

https://www.6yedollglobal.com/store/c52 ... up-Premium
I'm gonna say the first one is an updated 165N and the second one is a 161J.

Probably a mix-up throwing those both in the new 161L cup category.

Edit: but yes I agree, lets see 6YE respond with all the facts and a video tour WM Doll style.

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Thu Apr 28, 2022 11:03 pm

Mamilla wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 6:51 am https://www.6yedollglobal.com/store/c52 ... up-Premium
I'm gonna say the first one is an updated 165N and the second one is a 161J.

Probably a mix-up throwing those both in the new 161L cup category.

Edit: but yes I agree, lets see 6YE respond with all the facts and a video tour WM Doll style.

Hi!

This picture is grabbed from the 6Ye site. You can clearly see that 165N love hole placement is not updated. I think that 165N was never updated and it was just a rumour accidentally started up by a member who had received wrong factory pictures. The pictures wrongly showing the 161J's perfect LHP in stead of 165N. That is my theory and I will stick to it until more evidence surfaces!

Cheers!

Sili

: 165N_LHP.jpg (238.49 KiB) Viewed 1541 times

Jets Fan · Post by **Jets Fan** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:13 am

The 6YE 165N has definitely had two molds made. The original has bad LHP, but overall, the body looks good when standing up. It’s only when put in a sex position that the whole LHP moves way too forward.

The second 165N is far worse. It’s like they added extra TPE to make the crotch sag lower. Even when standing up it looks awful and ugly. And when put in a sex position the LHP isn’t just too forward, it looks like this gross excess of sagging flesh with sad looking orifices tacked on as an after thought.

The few times I’ve seen LHP corrected on a doll, it’s at the expense of butt cleavage.

It’s a shame because the 165N has both, an idealized body but also realistic musculature. The ultimate biG tit, big booty doll with a human sized waist. Just not a human placed vagina.

6YE has another thick bodied, mostly realistic doll but it also suffers from saggy crotch. I don’t know what’s going on at the design department. It’s a 170-something.

Mamilla · Post by **Mamilla** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:14 am

Siliconeman wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 11:03 pm
Hi!

This picture is grabbed from the 6Ye site. You can clearly see that 165N love hole placement is not updated. I think that 165N was never updated and it was just a rumour accidentally started up by a member who had received wrong factory pictures. The pictures wrongly showing the 161J's perfect LHP in stead of 165N. That is my theory and I will stick to it until more evidence surfaces!

Cheers!

Sili
165N_LHP.jpg

That's probably the first ever pic taken of the 165N it still has the ugly butt creases. We are all guessing here until we get an answer, but showing old photos and saying the body didn't get updated is like showing an old picture of yourself claiming you never aged.

Mamilla · Post by **Mamilla** » Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:19 am

Jets Fan wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 2:13 am
It’s a shame because the 165N has both, an idealized body but also realistic musculature. The ultimate biG tit, big booty doll with a human sized waist. Just not a human placed vagina.

Couldn't agree more. Kinda thankful they fuck so much stuff up. Kept me from spending my money

Another thick model is from the company we do not talk about 159.. super hot but bad LHP.