WE NEED YOUR OPINION ABOUT OUR FUTURE DOLL

Post by **YL Doll** » Sun Oct 17, 2021 9:07 pm

Hi guys! We would like to know which height of a new doll would interest you?

FCD94 · Post by **FCD94** » Sun Oct 17, 2021 10:54 pm

YL Doll wrote:Hi guys! We would like to know which height of a new doll would interest you?

Around 175CM, give or take a couple.

Dingo Pie · Post by **Dingo Pie** » Mon Oct 18, 2021 2:14 am

I picked 3 but 4 is also an option purely because of the average weight of the 140-160cm. Good luck with your new sculpt.

curious_person · Post by **curious_person** » Mon Oct 18, 2021 2:37 am

In my searches, currently there is a shortage of dolls 170+cm , 40kg maximum, with realistic LHP e.g. WM make the 164F 34kg,too short, and WM174G, 44kg - looks amazing but the weight is in overkill territory; there's a gap between them. . The recent WM175D is a great shape, but she has unrealistic vagina placement. Starpery made 2 interesting tall dolls but one is *too* skinny (33kg ,174C) the other too curvy (172F, 42kg).. again imagine something halfway between these, with realistic LHP

2 ideas:-
Something like the realistic WM172D body (40kg) but with realistic rear LHP.

or Imagine a version of the YL166K but with a longer torso (longer MTV distance), bringing it to 172cm, I actually quite like this slim but busty top-heavy look, imagine this theme realised with a 40kg weight budget. Again imagine a WM174G, keep her big boobs but shrink her butt to save weight and bring the height down slightly.

This could also be thought of as a cross between YL171H and WM175D .. it will contrast with the WM175D,WM175B, and Starpery 173C

mockup of idea:

: yl166Kmockup.jpg (177.95 KiB) Viewed 2999 times

good luck with whatever you choose to producce

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Mon Oct 18, 2021 2:49 am

FCD94 wrote:
YL Doll wrote:Hi guys! We would like to know which height of a new doll would interest you?
Around 175CM, give or take a couple.

Seconded, with a realistic waist and torso length.

Bluedog · Post by **Bluedog** » Mon Oct 18, 2021 8:43 am

4. or 5. with an A cup or smaller. Not overly thin, but under 75lbs.

Doll_Banger · Post by **Doll_Banger** » Mon Oct 18, 2021 9:10 am

yes 172-177cm and slim/skinny realistic body porportions with small (a or b cup) breasts please.

sophiahugeboobs · Post by **sophiahugeboobs** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 5:20 am

I would like a 170cm tall doll like this.

Dolllove1991 · Post by **Dolllove1991** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 5:41 am

I chose taller then 170.

But wouldn't mind a 140 A cup wm type body just taller.

Celtic_Babog · Post by **Celtic_Babog** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 6:10 am

A thread was made in WM recently.

I summed up my opinion at the end that a Nicki Minaj doll would fit the requirements.

You can take a look here.

viewtopic.php?f=215&t=144326&start=45

Minaj is 157cm in real life

dcb4w · Post by **dcb4w** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 6:23 pm

I can't figure out how to vote in the actual poll (maybe because I'm a new member still?) but I would like to see something in the mid-160s range. I'm finding designs I like in the market, but it seems like everything available is fairly heavy. If you could sculpt models about 165 cm +/- and keep the weight down, I think you'd be filling a gap in the market.

Dollfriend · Post by **Dollfriend** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 8:23 pm

I chose 146 - 152, anything smaller than this is too small and anything bigger is too big.

suppy · Post by **suppy** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 10:16 pm

My 2 cents being an owner of a YL157E for my first and only doll
WM174G is what i desire for my second purchase, although i find the nipple design not to be the best especially compared to the YL157E which i do consider to be the best! i have read the LHP is great with this sculpt which aint great on my 157
Cheers and good luck!

Flaneur123 · Post by **Flaneur123** » Tue Oct 19, 2021 11:08 pm

I love real girls who are 170cm but really not for dolls…

1st reason : the doll would be more heavy. It means that she is more difficult to move to another place and to change sex position during the action.

2nd reason : a smaller doll can handle the standing position more easily.

3rd reason : storage is a bit less complicated

I almost forgot about the cleaning. Easier too…

160 is a good compromise because smaller is unattractive to my opinion.