174G vs 166C comparision photos
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
174G vs 166C comparision photos
viewtopic.php?f=11&t=143214
he has given kind permission to post these comparison photos of the 174G and 166C which should be a great help to anyone considering a future purchase. Given the popularity of these and the specific niches they fill.. this is an amazing pair to see side by side (I mean both dolls). I'm a huge fan of these type of comparison photos, but I guess he doesn't want them disrupting the theme of either of his threads (bringing a doll to life with a unique personality.. vs viewing them as mere products to be reviewed I guess)
Immiediately you can see both how much more substantial the 174G looks (way more difference than you'd expect from a '+8cm' stat, due to volume), whilst the 166C must be so much lighter and easy to move.
- mrgatorade5
- Active Poster
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2021 2:36 pm
- Location: FL
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
Tiddy Shop Tiddies
- Celtic_Babog
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:07 am
- Location: Ireland
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
Review of Irontech 160cm silicone doll.
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
I've never touched a 166C unfortunately , these are DV's dolls. I was interested in this comparison as the 166C remains on my wish-listEmmaLover wrote:Thanks for that comparison, which do you find better in bed?
I can tell you how the 174G compares to the 172D,170D. a bit harder for missionary (but still enjoyable), superior for everything else (but 172D missionary beats everything I've tried so far).
Looking at how light the 166C looks.. I recall there is a whole category people refer to as "spinner" (light easy to move ..) but that might refer to things even lighter
- Out_Of_Sync
- Doll Elder
- Posts: 2147
- Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 4:20 pm
- Location: Texas
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
SM Doll 160f Silicone with heads 11 (Alice), 60 (Sydney), X2 (Jasmine), X8 ?
Private Island Beauties TPE Island Girls Eden, Hope, Isabella, Mina & Ellowyn
SM Doll 149b #56 "Angélique"
SM Doll 156c Riley (X8)
SM Doll 168c Cherry (102)
Kristi (32)
SM Doll 168c Lisa (X8)
SM Doll 168c Keri (X10)
WMDoll 170D 356 (Vix)
XYDoll 163c in white TPE Misa (Victoria)
Don't let the doll overlords kill your buzz.
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
IMO the 172D is just right.alk431 wrote:Thank you for these! Really helpful to see. It also illustrates how a 172D (my doll) is the middle ground between the two, which is both a good thing and a bad thing at the same time.
- bigchilli
- TDF Staff Alumni
- Posts: 8385
- Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:40 pm
- Location: Bonnie Scotland
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
I'm stunned at the size difference
I like small chicks so I'm not sure I'd go much taller than the 166 tbh
@curious_person
What makes missionary so good on the 172D? What's she like for cowgirl?
- curious_person
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 925
- Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2020 9:48 am
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
bear in mind some aspects are going to be specific to user geometry. All I can say for sure is the 172d just fits *me* perfectly; and the long torso = face to face, whatever the numbers say this isn't even always quite the case with the 174g. Being just that bit lighter means I can move with her a bit more. Roll over a little and her slimmer hips dont get in the way. Its all a tradeoff. Without the full articulation and autonomous self-adjustment that biodolls have .. I dont think one single TPE/silicone doll could handle everything.bigchilli wrote: @curious_person
What makes missionary so good on the 172D?
i've never even managed that to a point of enjoyment with any of my collection (all quite tall). I think dolls with better LHP would handle that better.. the 174g qualifies on that front, but is too heavy to control really.bigchilli wrote: What's she like for cowgirl?
- parapadarapa
- Active Member
- Posts: 116
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 4:41 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
+1 lolCeltic_Babog wrote:I have a 166cm and looking at the 174cm next to her I can safely say, no fucking way lol.
-
- Apprentice
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2021 9:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
-
- Active Poster
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2018 11:38 am
- Contact:
Re: 174G vs 166C comparision photos
The 174g though looks super hot is not as good in the bed as the 166. The LHP is a little off which bends your chaag awkwardly with she's riding and the vagina is not like the 166 at all even though it looks like it in photos
Bottom line the 166 stratled over you riding is the best position any love doll has to offer IMO!! That means the LHP and vagina are perfect for long joyous rides....
Every doll dude should have a 166c in their collection
Hope this helps