Wow folks, thanks a lot for all the insightful comments, I really appreciate it. Nice community here!
I think the big take away here is that I underestimated how big of a factor the weight is. I think I can safely rule out "option A" and probably "option C" now.
slvstake wrote:Buying a doll is a significant investment. If you really have your heart set on the WM 163 H, then I'd say wait for the REDUCED WEIGHT version. WM revealed the reduced weight version in APRIL, and the response was pretty positive. So you may only have to wait a few more months for wide release or at least further news. Honestly, you'd be kicking yourself in the butt if you buy the 110 lb version, and they release the 75lb version soon after. So what's a few months?
This comment is in reference to "option B" which is still in the mix... but I'm really excited to get a doll, and who knows if it will really be "a few months"? For all I know it could be next month, or 10 months from now. If they are still testing it and making changes, maybe over a year from now. Too bad I can't find any more info about WM's release date plans.
Also, if I get one of the first reduced-weight models, I guess that would make me a bit of a guinea pig. Who knows if the new technology will really be of enough quality to match the more "tried and true" models.
I guess I'm leaning toward "option D" now. After looking for bodies that still catch my eye but are a lower weight, I found:
WM 158 G
WM 162 F
WM 162 E
I'm going to do some more research on these models, but they are all about 34kg (75 lbs) which it sounds like you folks seem to be saying is more reasonable to deal with. Any further thoughts would be welcomed.