SM175L, she's here!

bigcups · Post by **bigcups** » Sat Nov 30, 2019 1:01 am

I really enjoy the shape of this busty babe, a nice small waist also. Her height and long legs should make for great leg photos and her huge breasts are very very nice, and finally, NO SAGGING. (I would hope to 'air them up" even more.) Another plus, this babe's breasts seem to jiggle nicely in the posted video. I am still on the fence because of her weight, but her spectacular body may tip the scale towards "Buy". I will wait for the "mcupplease" review and additional photos, especially side shots of her breasts at varying angles. I would also like to see how her breasts hang in doggie position.

Post by **SMdoll** » Sat Nov 30, 2019 9:29 am

bigcups wrote:I really enjoy the shape of this busty babe, a nice small waist also. Her height and long legs should make for great leg photos and her huge breasts are very very nice, and finally, NO SAGGING. (I would hope to 'air them up" even more.) Another plus, this babe's breasts seem to jiggle nicely in the posted video. I am still on the fence because of her weight, but her spectacular body may tip the scale towards "Buy". I will wait for the "mcupplease" review and additional photos, especially side shots of her breasts at varying angles. I would also like to see how her breasts hang in doggie position.

I'm so glad you like this doll, and now we have black Friday deals, orders can get discounted prices and extra heads. Looking forward to cooperating with you!
Star

niphigh · Post by **niphigh** » Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:34 pm

Of only the breast were scaled as well. Bigger breasts would have made it heavier yes but damn it would have been hot

Post by **SMdoll** » Tue Dec 03, 2019 8:04 pm

Thank you for liking her!

Star

: IMG_20191203_171759.jpg (1.18 MiB) Viewed 1345 times

Mcupplease · Post by **Mcupplease** » Thu Dec 05, 2019 1:42 pm

niphigh wrote:Of only the breast were scaled as well. Bigger breasts would have made it heavier yes but damn it would have been hot

Don't forget you are looking at these breasts on a 175 cm frame, and also I think the shoulders are much wider than is ever available normally on dolls.
in actuality I expect that the breasts will be very very large. I soon will be able to tell you firsthand and I will measure displacement volume for sure.

niphigh · Post by **niphigh** » Thu Dec 05, 2019 5:42 pm

As always Mcup leading the charge for breast connoisseurs everywhere!

Mcupplease · Post by **Mcupplease** » Thu Dec 05, 2019 9:43 pm

Now I am twice as excited. Check out this video done to demonstrate breast softness and size.

SM175L softness video.mp4: (8.61 MiB) Downloaded 953 times

I also requested some further videos.
I would love to see a video of:

1. Someone reaching around her torso from the back and squeezing the breasts together to show how much they can compress and squish into each other like real breasts.
2. Also reach around from the back one hand on the center of each breast, and pull back sqeezing them back into the torso to see how much they widen out and squish into the chest.

This would give a lot of information. There is a lot more to the softness of the breast than just how they jiggle against the torso.

Post by **SMdoll** » Fri Dec 06, 2019 8:28 am

More
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xu9N8A ... p=drivesdk

sophiahugeboobs · Post by **sophiahugeboobs** » Fri Dec 06, 2019 11:04 am

Mcupplease wrote: in actuality I expect that the breasts will be very very large. I soon will be able to tell you firsthand and I will measure displacement volume for sure.

Mcup I'm wishing you all the best with your new doll and all your wishes come true, but about the breast size there is probably desire father of thought. It's already
quite simple really huge breast are comming along with a great bustline please compare YL150 O/116cm, Jarliet153P/118cm and hidoll160/>140cm.
I'm looking forward to your displacement measurement, my expectation 3100cc.

Mcupplease · Post by **Mcupplease** » Fri Dec 06, 2019 11:56 am

Yes I will be sure to do lots of cross comparisons. Also in addition to volume displacement I am going to offer a softness score "S".

1. Real Human will be S=10/10 as a reference.
2. In the world of dolls the CP breast forms will rank S=9.5/10.
3. YL150O (customized for softness) S=7/10.
4.JAR153BBB (customized for softness) S=6/10.
5. I would estimate from this video we are looking at S=4.5/10 for the SM175L, but I will check carefully when she arrives.

Disclaimer-these are all subjective estimation scores until I figure out an objective measurement tool.

sophiahugeboobs · Post by **sophiahugeboobs** » Fri Dec 06, 2019 12:40 pm

Mcupplease wrote: Yes I will be sure to do lots of cross comparisons. Also in addition to volume displacement I am going to offer a softness score "S".

1. Real Human will be S=10/10 as a reference.
2. In the world of dolls the CP breast forms will rank S=9/10.
3. YL150O (customized for softness) S=6.5/10.
4.JAR153BBB (customized for softness) S=5.5/10.
5. I would estimate from this video we are looking at S=4/10 for the SM175L, but I will check carefully when she arrives.

Disclaimer-these are all subjective estimation scores until I figure out an objective measurement tool.

The softness of tpe is measured with the "A" scale from O Shore "A" to 90 Shore "A" with a Shore A measurement device.
I have bought such a device, the softness of soft tpe is <10. For excample the tpe of our HiDoll is 6-8 Shore A.

Mcupplease · Post by **Mcupplease** » Fri Dec 06, 2019 2:02 pm

I think it is a complicated measurement because the resistance to deformibility can vary considerably with depth. For example the Ruby 13 breast pillows appear to be very soft for the first half centimeter and then get exponentially more firm and resistant pushing into the material further so how to you express softness.
I think the most useful tool would be a fairly heavy metal cylinder of about 3-4 inches diameter lowered directly onto the front of the breast while in the lying position and then measure how far in it will settle until it meets equal opposing resistance.

Mcupplease · Post by **Mcupplease** » Fri Dec 06, 2019 8:27 pm

It looks like I just unknowingly re-invented the Shore Durometer softness measuring device LOL. I still think that a leading surface of 3 or 4 inches diameter will give more usable information because it is not just that material softness that is being tested but an actual object in this case and air-filled TPE cavity of the breast. Would you not agree?

: 300px-Durometer.svg.png (8.69 KiB) Viewed 1231 times

sophiahugeboobs · Post by **sophiahugeboobs** » Sat Dec 07, 2019 9:07 am

Mcupplease wrote:It looks like I just unknowingly re-invented the Shore Durometer softness measuring device LOL. I still think that a leading surface of 3 or 4 inches diameter will give more usable information because it is not just that material softness that is being tested but an actual object in this case and air-filled TPE cavity of the breast. Would you not agree?
300px-Durometer.svg.png

I will send you a PM.