The Doll Forum

Posted: **Wed May 03, 2023 9:17 pm**

Man why can’t they make the same 161cm mold into silicone? That booty would be perfect on a 160cm silicone doll.

Posted: **Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:52 pm**

12_21_2 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:01 am 165 N imo. The 161j has a foam cask inside the legs/ it is not all tpe vs. the 165n. The 165n also just felt much better

Can anyone back this up? The 161 is 7 whole KG heavier than the 165 somehow. I'd also like to avoid foam fillings, so how would I find this out?

Posted: **Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:10 pm**

inglorioushz wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:52 pm
12_21_2 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:01 am 165 N imo. The 161j has a foam cask inside the legs/ it is not all tpe vs. the 165n. The 165n also just felt much better
Can anyone back this up? The 161 is 7 whole KG heavier than the 165 somehow. I'd also like to avoid foam fillings, so how would I find this out?

Weight reduction with foam in TPE dolls has nothing to do with specific sculpts. Just make sure you request through your vendor or seller that the doll be made without a foam core.

I went with the 165N and regret it. They tried to fix the LHP but it doesn't look right visually. The 161 is mint.

Posted: **Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:19 pm**

setevoltas wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:10 pm
inglorioushz wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:52 pm
12_21_2 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:01 am 165 N imo. The 161j has a foam cask inside the legs/ it is not all tpe vs. the 165n. The 165n also just felt much better
Can anyone back this up? The 161 is 7 whole KG heavier than the 165 somehow. I'd also like to avoid foam fillings, so how would I find this out?
Weight reduction with foam in TPE dolls has nothing to do with specific sculpts. Just make sure you request through your vendor or seller that the doll be made without a foam core.

I went with the 165N and regret it. They tried to fix the LHP but it doesn't look right visually. The 161 is mint.

Aaaah, I see. Thanks for the input. Now I've gotta somehow narrow my decision to a foamless 161, 173H, or Funwest 165KK... Just wish there were more photos of it.

Posted: **Sat Apr 06, 2024 9:37 pm**

inglorioushz wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:19 pm
setevoltas wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 8:10 pm
inglorioushz wrote: ↑Sat Apr 06, 2024 7:52 pm
12_21_2 wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 6:01 am 165 N imo. The 161j has a foam cask inside the legs/ it is not all tpe vs. the 165n. The 165n also just felt much better
Can anyone back this up? The 161 is 7 whole KG heavier than the 165 somehow. I'd also like to avoid foam fillings, so how would I find this out?
Weight reduction with foam in TPE dolls has nothing to do with specific sculpts. Just make sure you request through your vendor or seller that the doll be made without a foam core.

I went with the 165N and regret it. They tried to fix the LHP but it doesn't look right visually. The 161 is mint.
Aaaah, I see. Thanks for the input. Now I've gotta somehow narrow my decision to a foamless 161, 173H, or Funwest 165KK... Just wish there were more photos of it.

All pretty different. Short and thick, athletic thick, or top-heavy MILF thick. If bad LHP is a deal breaker, go with the 161J.

The Doll Forum

I want an 6Ye 161 cm N cup or 165 cm N cup. Help me choose.

Re: I want an 6Ye 161 cm N cup or 165 cm N cup. Help me choose.

Re: I want an 6Ye 161 cm N cup or 165 cm N cup. Help me choose.

Re: I want an 6Ye 161 cm N cup or 165 cm N cup. Help me choose.

Re: I want an 6Ye 161 cm N cup or 165 cm N cup. Help me choose.

Re: I want an 6Ye 161 cm N cup or 165 cm N cup. Help me choose.