Vagina and anus placement

Post by **Slew** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:51 am

I have a fairly straight penis, but it is pointing upward when erect. We all achieve penetration at slightly different angles. Different body styles and the body styles their paired up with for sex, make it a hodgepodge of positions, but the rudimentary version of "missionary", for me has always involved my penis, while inserted in a woman, pointing slightly back toward me, almost in a curve. My sore lumbar spine, just thinking about it.

I think the difficulty level, pertaining to the angle of the canal, depends on the position, and the flexibility of the doll, but it's the same with a girl. sex is difficult if the parties involved aren't able to bend, twist, arch back, thrust pelvis forward. I've hurt my back during sex many, many times.

I wasn't originally concerned with the angle of the canal, but it's great that it came up, more fodder for the drawing board.

dragonfly8878 · Post by **dragonfly8878** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:48 am

I think what siliken is suggesting is a good compromise; move the openings back about an inch or so to be more visually correct, and angle the vagina and rectum backward a bit. I believe the angle backward helps keep the missionary position workable. Essentially, that's what people are trying to accomplish by putting a pillow under the lower back and behind; it changes the angle of the vagina in the same direction relative to the person on top. Excellent illustrations, by the way.

: vaginpa.jpg (117.36 KiB) Viewed 2779 times

: vaginab.jpg (114.2 KiB) Viewed 2779 times

dragonfly8878 · Post by **dragonfly8878** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:51 am

Since we're on the topic, I've always enjoyed this commercial:
"One might say it's the most powerful thing on Earth."

Tybalt · Post by **Tybalt** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:18 am

LadyPeridot · Post by **LadyPeridot** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:25 am

Can I just say that as a woman this conversation is an absolute delight. One of the first thing's I noticed back when I was learning about life size dolls was how often they aren't anatomically correct. Just saying if a sculptor is going make the form of a woman down to her small collar bones or dimples above her butt, then at least put that much attention to detail in the most defining attribute of a woman.

dragonfly8878 · Post by **dragonfly8878** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:30 am

LadyPeridot wrote:Can I just say that as a woman this conversation is an absolute delight. One of the first thing's I noticed back when I was learning about life size dolls was how often they aren't anatomically correct. Just saying if a sculptor is going make the form of a woman down to her small collar bones or dimples above her butt, then at least put that much attention to detail in the most defining attribute of a woman.

Absolutely. Hail to the V!

dragonfly8878 · Post by **dragonfly8878** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 3:33 am

And yes, let's finally put the pussy on the chainwax.

Xephyr · Post by **Xephyr** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:50 am

siliken wrote:
Xephyr wrote:The contours of the vagina should follow the same structure of an erect penis.

Penis curves upward when erect. Therefore, the vagina's internal structure should curve in the same direction.
Are you being serious Xephyr? I guess you've never watched porn before...

I mean, due to the elastic nature of human flesh and tissue, of course there are exceptions to being able to bend many ways. For instance, if you wanted to you could bend your penis towards your scrotum with minimum pain and discomfort (lol). But the moment you let go, it's going to spring right back to where it was, curved upwards.

I guess I was talking more from a missionary point of view.

Once the penis goes into the vagina, then the penis pretty much follows the path of the vagina, and not of that of its own. If the vagina doesn't at least curve the way that the penis does, sex would probably be a little uncomfortable for both parties. Or at least for insertion it could be.
Imagine stripping down with a nice lady, about to insert yourself, only to find that her vagina curves the opposite direction of a normal one does.

Such a structure (not saying it is even at all possible, bar deformities, just as example) would mean you'd have to change the way you would normally have sex.

Xephyr · Post by **Xephyr** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 9:57 am

That said, I find it interesting how both missionary and doggy style work pretty well, despite being totally different positions. From the back, vagina curves upward. From the front, the vagina still curves upward. The human body is phenomenal.

Edit: Wait, no. I am wrong. Missionary the vagina curves downward. wtf... Now I'm confused.

Post by **AlexKnight** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:56 pm

A woman can move her pelvis so the vagina curves differently. That's why a curved back is important in for example doggy style, if a woman doesn't curve her back, deep penetration won't be possible.

Just imagine a standing position for both with him penetrating from behind, that'll mess with your mind

It's not an easy position, but it'll hit her g-spot like crazy

Chronos · Post by **Chronos** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:25 pm

In 20 years you'll whisper the right word in your doll's ear and she'll bend her pelvis forward or backward as you wish. Or she'll even have sensors down there and do it automatically...

dragonfly8878 · Post by **dragonfly8878** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:36 pm

siliken wrote:In 20 years you'll whisper the right word in your doll's ear and she'll bend her pelvis forward or backward as you wish. Or she'll even have sensors down there and do it automatically...

From your mouth to all the doll makers ears.

(Except hopefully a lower number than 20.)

Tybalt · Post by **Tybalt** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 1:56 pm

AlexKnight wrote:A woman can move her pelvis so the vagina curves differently. That's why a curved back is important in for example doggy style, if a woman doesn't curve her back, deep penetration won't be possible.

Just imagine a standing position for both with him penetrating from behind, that'll mess with your mind It's not an easy position, but it'll hit her g-spot like crazy

I agree. My Wm 145cm's back can not bend at all, so doggy is difficult. Making it even more difficult is that the anus is so far forward that its actually in the spot where the vagina should be and the vagina is pushed forward. Making thrice as difficult, the angles of the canals are all wrong too.

WM, please fire who ever designed the anus and vagina area and replace with an expert who will make corrections. No offense...or at least tell your lead designer to make these corrections now. If you molded these dolls from a live model, do not use her for future models because she was born with an irregular vagina and anus. If this was the result of a marketing decision instead of a design, then absolutely fire that silver tongue devil for ruining my 1st doll experience. Designers and Engineers work very hard, so I sympathize with them. Its the hot shot fast talking lying marketers who I have no sympathy for.

Chronos · Post by **Chronos** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 2:38 pm

I feel your pain Tybalt. I think the 145 cms aren't replicants of human females but possibly the Vegan 4 race (25 LY from Earth). Their "arrangement" is similar. But the vegans are triple jointed and can contort their form into any knot you can't imagine, I speak from experience. Just turn down the lights and doggy that bung and you won't know the difference. Till the makers fix it.

66dingo · Post by **66dingo** » Sat Sep 20, 2014 4:01 pm

This reminds me of an old ditty:

There was a yong man from Ghent
Whose tool was exceedingly bent
To save him some trouble
He put it in double
And instead of cumming, he went!