A question regarding our biggest torso
A question regarding our biggest torso
- Attachments
-
- YLB13.png (80.74 KiB) Viewed 793 times
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
No worries. It's not everyone's piece of cake for sure.
- cycleingking
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
Thank you! That's the plancycleingking wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:38 pm 100% yes. Ive wanted to see this torso in a full body for years! I know that I am not alone. So yes, please make this full body with good weight reduction and good LHP and there will be buyers. Strong emphasis on LHP and weight!
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
I would say to go for more classical shape first since many guys cannot handle the weight of a full doll. THAN later on you could go for the fat model. My guess is that you would sell more with a classical shape and you could go niche later on.
Jael - (YL 148) viewtopic.php?f=212&t=73333
Miriame - (SM 136) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=102115
Beth - (SM 157G) viewtopic.php?f=269&t=149637
Brooke - (Starpery 148F) viewtopic.php?t=175783
***
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
The weight shouldn't be a problem. The full version of this torso will be with weight reduction.Babel99 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:40 pm That torso shape is the best since it has a skeleton, short leg for positioning and a head. Mostly NO manufacturers took advantage of that shape yet (with a head on). I only saw Irontech doing one so far. Most torsos have arms (fragile fingers and in the way for quick repositioning) or no legs at all (not good for positions).
I would say to go for more classical shape first since many guys cannot handle the weight of a full doll. THAN later on you could go for the fat model. My guess is that you would sell more with a classical shape and you could go niche later on.
- cycleingking
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1025
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2022 12:57 am
- Location: Middle of America engulfed by mistresses
- Contact:
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
YL Doll wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:34 pmThank you! That's the plancycleingking wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 5:38 pm 100% yes. Ive wanted to see this torso in a full body for years! I know that I am not alone. So yes, please make this full body with good weight reduction and good LHP and there will be buyers. Strong emphasis on LHP and weight!
This is a great development YL. Thank you for taking an interest in this style of dolls!YL Doll wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:48 pmThe weight shouldn't be a problem. The full version of this torso will be with weight reduction.Babel99 wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 6:40 pm That torso shape is the best since it has a skeleton, short leg for positioning and a head. Mostly NO manufacturers took advantage of that shape yet (with a head on). I only saw Irontech doing one so far. Most torsos have arms (fragile fingers and in the way for quick repositioning) or no legs at all (not good for positions).
I would say to go for more classical shape first since many guys cannot handle the weight of a full doll. THAN later on you could go for the fat model. My guess is that you would sell more with a classical shape and you could go niche later on.
There are plenty of dolls that fall into the "classical shape". The exciting development here is YL effectively working on a BBW doll with promised good LHP and reduced weight. There are more than plenty of us that appreciate the BBW shape!!!
Time for me to rally TGC (Thick Girl Club) members!
Passionate about ROS, LHP and Silicone
Mistresses
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
Also, obviously the vagina should be far back and puffy enough to be able to enter into her vagina in doggy.
To achieve the above goals I am fine with "just" a 127cm/50inch booty (I know b13 booty is bigger, but just saying) and 114cm/45inch boobs, anything bigger than that is an extra which I appreciate but know well it's almost impossible to achieve.
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
Hell yes!
After that masterpiece YL 158cm, I was hoping YL would make another full sized BBW queen
As you saw, the YL 158cm sold well, and was very popular. Perfect height, and extreme attributes made her a winner!
It would be great to see YL push the boundaries slightly further.
Maybe she can be slightly taller than 158cm, like 163-165cm, with the same extreme attributes, or perhaps the 158cm is the sweet spot. Either way, I'm excited for this doll
Good luck!
173cm H WM Doll
161cm J 6YE Doll
160cm Nipple AXB Doll
158cm N YL Doll
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
I hope we will be able to finish her soon.NINJASEX wrote: ↑Thu May 09, 2024 9:10 pmHell yes!
After that masterpiece YL 158cm, I was hoping YL would make another full sized BBW queen
As you saw, the YL 158cm sold well, and was very popular. Perfect height, and extreme attributes made her a winner!
It would be great to see YL push the boundaries slightly further.
Maybe she can be slightly taller than 158cm, like 163-165cm, with the same extreme attributes, or perhaps the 158cm is the sweet spot. Either way, I'm excited for this doll
Good luck!
-
- Active Poster
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 9:09 pm
- Contact:
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
Also— now that STPE has improved resistance to tearing and deformation I think this is the perfect opportunity to introduce a gel butt. This torso has the deepest butt cheeks on the market so as long as you don’t lose that while creating the full body sculpt it’s the perfect candidate for gel.
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
I'll have a close eye on this, subscribed!
YL158 is already a masterpiece, and this one will be her full version on steroids!
Nothing to change on the body overall shape, just improve the LHP, add the limbs and you will hit the jackpot for sure!
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
does that mean the tpe will be firm or soft jiggly? I heard some horror stories from others that said weight reduction had firm tpe, hardly any jiggle.
173cm H WM Doll
161cm J 6YE Doll
160cm Nipple AXB Doll
158cm N YL Doll
- Ygdrasilxyz
- Senior Member
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Thu Nov 23, 2017 1:56 am
- Location: Harem construction site
- Contact:
Re: A question regarding our biggest torso
In all seriousness, really nice to see that YL Doll is picking this up. Legless and armless torsos are really an acquired taste. Not so sure about weight reduction, a user here who owned the B13 Torso found that they were filled with large metal balls? Ideally, there would be a "no weight reduction option" for a full body model just like with the current torso.
The B13 is a very extreme hourglass figure, but there are other "BBW" body types that haven't been explored by JinsanDolls either. Like a "Pear" figure with larger 71cm thighs and medium breasts, or a more compact YL-158 type body with a bigger waist (I don't mean a big gut with fat rolls, but closer to 80cm, like the WM-168cm).
But most important, new models have to come out with accurate Love-Hole Placement right out of the gate. It's increasingly becoming a deal-breaker for many people. I talked about this to my regular vendor recently, there are upwards of 15 "BBW" models from different manufacturers that I immediately lose interest in as soon as I see the useless stomach vaginas. Similarly, I wouldn't buy a doll with wire hands under any circumstances at this point.
YL-158 K-cup with 220 face "Lady D"
WM-163 H-cup with 198 face Big Tiddy Goth GF
HR-164 G-cup with 26 face "Vampirella"
Irontech-156 E-cup ebony with Penny face "Mercedes Monroe"
6YE-161 L-cup with 213 face "Karen Starr" aka PowerGirl