Sedoll Silicone-pro series is released！🔥

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Thu Jan 18, 2024 8:40 pm

165cm/5ft4 C-cup Queena.H
https://www.sedoll.com/product/silicone ... ll-ses013/

Twitter: @Eurus Allen
Facebook: @Allen Eurus
Welcome to send me PM to buy sexdolls!
click the link to find more info
https://linktr.ee/sedoll

ondsdoll · Post by **ondsdoll** » Thu Jan 18, 2024 9:24 pm

Can you show us more picture of LHP? I have not seen any proper picture of it yet and cannot judge it that way as a potential customer

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Thu Jan 18, 2024 9:48 pm

ondsdoll wrote: ↑Thu Jan 18, 2024 9:24 pm Can you show us more picture of LHP? I have not seen any proper picture of it yet and cannot judge it that way as a potential customer

I've PM'ed you the needed photos.

King Solo · Post by **King Solo** » Thu Jan 18, 2024 10:58 pm

Barbararara wrote: ↑Tue Jan 16, 2024 9:51 pm
silicon wrote: ↑Mon Jan 15, 2024 10:38 pm Nana.C
SES006（Head：#071SO is the Head that's caught my attention, I have been looking for a fully loaded doll for some time, I am looking forward to seeing the video showing the love holes in action you can pm me or show it here many thanks..
I've already sent it to you.

I would like to see this as well, if you wouldn't mind. These new SE Pro models are really beginning to pique my interest.

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Fri Jan 19, 2024 12:47 am

I would like to see this as well, if you wouldn't mind. These new SE Pro models are really beginning to pique my interest.

Sure

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Fri Jan 19, 2024 1:56 am

Twitter: @Eurus Allen
Facebook: @Allen Eurus
Welcome to send me PM to buy sexdolls!
click the link to find more info
https://linktr.ee/sedoll

cycleingking · Post by **cycleingking** » Fri Jan 19, 2024 2:59 am

Barbararara wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 4:24 am
DollCommander wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 9:04 pm SE,

I'm not trying to beat you guys up, I want to see these Silicone-Pro dolls succeed. These dolls look great at a quick glance, but I see some things that are very concerning..

This entrance hole looks ridiculously small. Like painfully small and like it will tear on first use.
SES008-36~2.jpg

This entrance hole is way too small even with legs spread and hole placement is way too high. This will be hard to access from behind (doggy) if even possible.
SES008-32~2.jpg

Adjusting hole placement here (green dot) would be much better in making the vagina accessible from behind (doggy). Not perfect, but better and without moving everything else on the mold.
SES008-32~3.jpg

Something like this.
Screenshot_20231225-210903~2.png

Those holes need to be much bigger, like twice as big or more at a minimum or they will be painful or unuseable and will tear very quickly. Silicone holes cannot be sized like TPE, silicone is inherently much less elastic than TPE. The hole placement is not good; poor hole placement is the one thing that kept me from buying SE TPE dolls in the past.

Who is making these dolls? Jinsan/WM/Angel Kiss? Because they have the same problems. I heard something about SE having a relationship with SM, I would suggest having SM make your Silicone-Pro line because they do silicone hole sizing right with acceptable LHP.
hi，

I understand what you mean. Regarding the entrance size, I have just been informed that it is adjustable, and you can specify your requirements when placing an order. As for LHP, I will provide timely feedback on your suggestion. Thank you very much for your kind and enthusiastic comment. However, LHP is a long-standing topic that may not have a unanimous opinion among everyone. maybe it requires more voices and time to reach a consensus.

A Fresh Photo from the Factory
CS%UU8Y4~B7O`6QTL%H)`I3.jpg

@Barbararara,

Respectfully, producing dolls with realistic placement is not something that needs a consensus. Just as boobs naturally need to be properly placed on a doll in order to be considered realistic, so do love holes. There is no downside to correct placement. The one thing that ALL real women share is the ability to have sex functionally from multiple positions. In a minimal effort to produce functional sex doll companions, realistic love hole placement is just as important as all other assumed body parts. If boobs were placed on the stomach the way a lot of the vaginas are, there would be an even more obvious issue. This issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

Here's a growing collection of dolls that have been produced with "good" placement. There is a range, but ALL of them have good and accessible placement from multiple positions. They also look more realistic when photographed for those that particularly care about that aspect. viewtopic.php?t=172314

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:06 am

cycleingking wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 2:59 am
Barbararara wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 4:24 am
DollCommander wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 9:04 pm SE,

I'm not trying to beat you guys up, I want to see these Silicone-Pro dolls succeed. These dolls look great at a quick glance, but I see some things that are very concerning..

This entrance hole looks ridiculously small. Like painfully small and like it will tear on first use.
SES008-36~2.jpg

This entrance hole is way too small even with legs spread and hole placement is way too high. This will be hard to access from behind (doggy) if even possible.
SES008-32~2.jpg

Adjusting hole placement here (green dot) would be much better in making the vagina accessible from behind (doggy). Not perfect, but better and without moving everything else on the mold.
SES008-32~3.jpg

Something like this.
Screenshot_20231225-210903~2.png

Those holes need to be much bigger, like twice as big or more at a minimum or they will be painful or unuseable and will tear very quickly. Silicone holes cannot be sized like TPE, silicone is inherently much less elastic than TPE. The hole placement is not good; poor hole placement is the one thing that kept me from buying SE TPE dolls in the past.

Who is making these dolls? Jinsan/WM/Angel Kiss? Because they have the same problems. I heard something about SE having a relationship with SM, I would suggest having SM make your Silicone-Pro line because they do silicone hole sizing right with acceptable LHP.
hi，

I understand what you mean. Regarding the entrance size, I have just been informed that it is adjustable, and you can specify your requirements when placing an order. As for LHP, I will provide timely feedback on your suggestion. Thank you very much for your kind and enthusiastic comment. However, LHP is a long-standing topic that may not have a unanimous opinion among everyone. maybe it requires more voices and time to reach a consensus.

A Fresh Photo from the Factory
CS%UU8Y4~B7O`6QTL%H)`I3.jpg
@Barbararara,

Respectfully, producing dolls with realistic placement is not something that needs a consensus. Just as boobs naturally need to be properly placed on a doll in order to be considered realistic, so do love holes. There is no downside to correct placement. The one thing that ALL real women share is the ability to have sex functionally from multiple positions. In a minimal effort to produce functional sex doll companions, realistic love hole placement is just as important as all other assumed body parts. If boobs were placed on the stomach the way a lot of the vaginas are, there would be an even more obvious issue. This issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

Here's a growing collection of dolls that have been produced with "good" placement. There is a range, but ALL of them have good and accessible placement from multiple positions. They also look more realistic when photographed for those that particularly care about that aspect. viewtopic.php?t=172314

I'm sorry, what I meant in my comment is: everyone has different views on LHP, and I personally cannot judge who is right. If many people agree with DollCommander's opinions on LHP, then we will also modify our molds based on his suggestions to meet the needs of the majority. Having the correct LHP certainly has no downside, and we hope our molds are perfect, pleasing more people, but in reality, this is a big challenge. However, whenever I encounter similar issues here, I will promptly report them. Good things take time. Thank you very much for your sharing, you are right, this issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

cycleingking · Post by **cycleingking** » Fri Jan 19, 2024 9:56 am

Barbararara wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:06 am
I'm sorry, what I meant in my comment is: everyone has different views on LHP, and I personally cannot judge who is right. If many people agree with DollCommander's opinions on LHP, then we will also modify our molds based on his suggestions to meet the needs of the majority. Having the correct LHP certainly has no downside, and we hope our molds are perfect, pleasing more people, but in reality, this is a big challenge. However, whenever I encounter similar issues here, I will promptly report them. Good things take time. Thank you very much for your sharing, you are right, this issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

I am going to cross post the most basic explanation that I have seen in a while written by KingSolo. Again, this is just body anatomy. I don't see companies struggling where to position breasts on a doll because its just body anatomy.

King Solo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 6:47 pm By rule of thumb, this is "NATURALLY" where the opening of woman's vagina should ALWAYS be located and positioned.

Always at the "bottom base-line" of her butt cheeks ....and of course, the anus is positioned a few cm above that, pointing straight up at you whenever she's bent over in the doggystyle position.
(Face down, ass up)

LHP Rule.png (601.37 KiB) Viewed 456 times

This should not be as controversial as it is made out to be. What I am advocating for is for company's to stop treating this as if it is a "feature request" that requires "opinions" from users and more function to the core doll- every doll. There is no question where to place lips on a face, ears on a head in order for those to be considered "realistic". I hope this information helps. The great thing is that you can literally use any female naked body as examples. The vagina NEVER sits high up on the pubis maxis area a woman. Thanks again for being open to the feedback! SE Doll has so many dolls that have my attention. I am not alone.

EDIT: SE Doll, this model of yours is your own example of very good LHP
https://www.sedoll.com/product/silicone ... ll-ses002/

: 165cm_5ft5_C-cup_Silicone_Sex_Doll_–_Regina_F_-_RosemaryDoll.jpg (104.23 KiB) Viewed 439 times

ondsdoll · Post by **ondsdoll** » Fri Jan 19, 2024 11:45 pm

Barbararara wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:06 am
cycleingking wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 2:59 am
Barbararara wrote: ↑Tue Dec 26, 2023 4:24 am
DollCommander wrote: ↑Mon Dec 25, 2023 9:04 pm SE,

I'm not trying to beat you guys up, I want to see these Silicone-Pro dolls succeed. These dolls look great at a quick glance, but I see some things that are very concerning..

This entrance hole looks ridiculously small. Like painfully small and like it will tear on first use.
SES008-36~2.jpg

This entrance hole is way too small even with legs spread and hole placement is way too high. This will be hard to access from behind (doggy) if even possible.
SES008-32~2.jpg

Adjusting hole placement here (green dot) would be much better in making the vagina accessible from behind (doggy). Not perfect, but better and without moving everything else on the mold.
SES008-32~3.jpg

Something like this.
Screenshot_20231225-210903~2.png

Those holes need to be much bigger, like twice as big or more at a minimum or they will be painful or unuseable and will tear very quickly. Silicone holes cannot be sized like TPE, silicone is inherently much less elastic than TPE. The hole placement is not good; poor hole placement is the one thing that kept me from buying SE TPE dolls in the past.

Who is making these dolls? Jinsan/WM/Angel Kiss? Because they have the same problems. I heard something about SE having a relationship with SM, I would suggest having SM make your Silicone-Pro line because they do silicone hole sizing right with acceptable LHP.
hi，

I understand what you mean. Regarding the entrance size, I have just been informed that it is adjustable, and you can specify your requirements when placing an order. As for LHP, I will provide timely feedback on your suggestion. Thank you very much for your kind and enthusiastic comment. However, LHP is a long-standing topic that may not have a unanimous opinion among everyone. maybe it requires more voices and time to reach a consensus.

A Fresh Photo from the Factory
CS%UU8Y4~B7O`6QTL%H)`I3.jpg
@Barbararara,

Respectfully, producing dolls with realistic placement is not something that needs a consensus. Just as boobs naturally need to be properly placed on a doll in order to be considered realistic, so do love holes. There is no downside to correct placement. The one thing that ALL real women share is the ability to have sex functionally from multiple positions. In a minimal effort to produce functional sex doll companions, realistic love hole placement is just as important as all other assumed body parts. If boobs were placed on the stomach the way a lot of the vaginas are, there would be an even more obvious issue. This issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

Here's a growing collection of dolls that have been produced with "good" placement. There is a range, but ALL of them have good and accessible placement from multiple positions. They also look more realistic when photographed for those that particularly care about that aspect. viewtopic.php?t=172314

I'm sorry, what I meant in my comment is: everyone has different views on LHP, and I personally cannot judge who is right. If many people agree with DollCommander's opinions on LHP, then we will also modify our molds based on his suggestions to meet the needs of the majority. Having the correct LHP certainly has no downside, and we hope our molds are perfect, pleasing more people, but in reality, this is a big challenge. However, whenever I encounter similar issues here, I will promptly report them. Good things take time. Thank you very much for your sharing, you are right, this issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

Your dolls look very beatiful but the LHP is not okay.
I am therefore of the opinion that progress is made by absorbing criticism regarding LHP and working on it with your next doll.

Companies that take the customer seriously flourish. Something that must appeal to a company that wants to continue to develop itself and it's products?
check the votes. viewtopic.php?t=119567&hilit=WM+162F+LHP&start=855

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:35 pm

cycleingking wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 9:56 am
Barbararara wrote: ↑Fri Jan 19, 2024 5:06 am
I'm sorry, what I meant in my comment is: everyone has different views on LHP, and I personally cannot judge who is right. If many people agree with DollCommander's opinions on LHP, then we will also modify our molds based on his suggestions to meet the needs of the majority. Having the correct LHP certainly has no downside, and we hope our molds are perfect, pleasing more people, but in reality, this is a big challenge. However, whenever I encounter similar issues here, I will promptly report them. Good things take time. Thank you very much for your sharing, you are right, this issue is a major issue that needs to be taken more seriously.

I am going to cross post the most basic explanation that I have seen in a while written by KingSolo. Again, this is just body anatomy. I don't see companies struggling where to position breasts on a doll because its just body anatomy.

King Solo wrote: ↑Sat Jan 13, 2024 6:47 pm By rule of thumb, this is "NATURALLY" where the opening of woman's vagina should ALWAYS be located and positioned.

Always at the "bottom base-line" of her butt cheeks ....and of course, the anus is positioned a few cm above that, pointing straight up at you whenever she's bent over in the doggystyle position.
(Face down, ass up)
LHP Rule.png

This should not be as controversial as it is made out to be. What I am advocating for is for company's to stop treating this as if it is a "feature request" that requires "opinions" from users and more function to the core doll- every doll. There is no question where to place lips on a face, ears on a head in order for those to be considered "realistic". I hope this information helps. The great thing is that you can literally use any female naked body as examples. The vagina NEVER sits high up on the pubis maxis area a woman. Thanks again for being open to the feedback! SE Doll has so many dolls that have my attention. I am not alone.

EDIT: SE Doll, this model of yours is your own example of very good LHP
https://www.sedoll.com/product/silicone ... ll-ses002/

165cm_5ft5_C-cup_Silicone_Sex_Doll_–_Regina_F_-_RosemaryDoll.jpg

Fantastic! Wonderful comment. Thank you so much for sharing the pictures. They hold great reference value, and I will definitely share your suggestions. Thank you!

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:51 pm

Your dolls look very beatiful but the LHP is not okay.
I am therefore of the opinion that progress is made by absorbing criticism regarding LHP and working on it with your next doll.

Companies that take the customer seriously flourish. Something that must appeal to a company that wants to continue to develop itself and it's products?
check the votes. viewtopic.php?t=119567&hilit=WM+162F+LHP&start=855

Yes, we will actively take feedback into account. Thank you for sharing the link. It is very persuasive and having a good LHP is crucial.

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:53 pm

Twitter: @Eurus Allen
Facebook: @Allen Eurus
Welcome to send me PM to buy sexdolls!
click the link to find more info
https://linktr.ee/sedoll

goofy_dr_love · Post by **goofy_dr_love** » Wed Jan 24, 2024 3:48 am

Barbararara wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2024 8:53 pm Yuuki.I（Head: #076SC）
Height: 155cm | 5ft1
Material: Silicone
Bra size: E-cup
Bust: 79.5cm | 31.30 in
Waist: 59cm | 23.23 in
Hips: 92cm | 36.22 in
Weight: 23kg | 50.71 lbs
https://www.sedoll.com/product/silicone ... ll-ses001/

Twitter: @Eurus Allen
Facebook: @Allen Eurus
Welcome to send me PM to buy sexdolls!
click the link to find more info
https://linktr.ee/sedoll

Great body! I am looking at this body since release but i haven't received information i need to order one.
Is this weight with added softness and gel-filled ass?
Could you upload a video to show softness of the body and if possible where gel-filled fill boobs end and gel-filled ass end to see where harder material starts.
Thank you

Barbararara · Post by **Barbararara** » Wed Jan 24, 2024 9:49 pm

Great body! I am looking at this body since release but i haven't received information i need to order one.
Is this weight with added softness and gel-filled ass?
Could you upload a video to show softness of the body and if possible where gel-filled fill boobs end and gel-filled ass end to see where harder material starts.
Thank you

Hello, the above weight does not include options for softness and gel-filled ass. Currently, I only have videos of gel-filled breasts and gel-filled asses.
If you need other videos, you will have to wait until after the Spring Festival holiday, as the factory is about to go on vacation and we do not have a body with all softness options selected.

gel-filled breast