SORRY, SEDoll firmly refuses copyright infringement!

Joy123 · Post by **Joy123** » Thu Aug 19, 2021 2:36 am

Recently, we found that 9 styles from SEDoll are showed on http://acsexdolls.com and sold at a low price.

This act of directly depriving our achievements has seriously infringed our right to reputation. We have contacted the lawyer.

We solemnly state that acsexdolls is not our agent, and we are extremely resentful of this kind of infringement, as well as any other form of infringement！

If you encounter the abnormal price of SEDoll in the future, please tell us. We will certainly take up the weapon of law.

SEDoll thanks for your attention and trust.

Joy123 · Post by **Joy123** » Thu Aug 19, 2021 10:34 pm

Severely attacks the right infringement！

Flaneur123 · Post by **Flaneur123** » Thu Aug 19, 2021 11:57 pm

This website should be blacklisted and those dolls are certainly crap with very bad quality materials

Siliconeman · Post by **Siliconeman** » Fri Aug 20, 2021 12:12 am

Did they copy your bad LHP as well?

seagull · Post by **seagull** » Fri Aug 20, 2021 7:36 am

Ouch!
The post is about an SEDoll rip-off and that is theft

onetrick79 · Post by **onetrick79** » Sat Aug 21, 2021 6:17 am

I'm sorry to hear that. But about the LHP, my 167E just arrived this week from a reputable vendor, and I'm more than delighted with her. The LHP seems fine to me, and the detail of the sculpt is brilliant. Its disappointing that people have stolen your design, I hope you can put a stop to it. My genuine SEdoll is fantastic - keep up the good work

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sat Aug 21, 2021 6:24 am

onetrick79 wrote:I'm sorry to hear that. But about the LHP, my 167E just arrived this week from a reputable vendor, and I'm more than delighted with her. The LHP seems fine to me, and the detail of the sculpt is brilliant. Its disappointing that people have stolen your design, I hope you can put a stop to it. My genuine SEdoll is fantastic - keep up the good work

The 167's LHP was improved over when she was first released. She's a lovely sculpt (I particularly like the Emily head) and on my short list.

I noticed that SE are not the only brand to have their products ripped off on that website.

Reodor Felgen · Post by **Reodor Felgen** » Sat Aug 21, 2021 7:03 am

I think it's good to see that there is also a Chinese company that takes copyright laws seriously.
I hope this can be the beginning of the end of piracy.

AGL · Post by **AGL** » Sat Aug 21, 2021 1:33 pm

Siliconeman wrote:Did they copy your bad LHP as well?

esquisseallure · Post by **esquisseallure** » Sun Aug 22, 2021 1:14 am

Siliconeman wrote:Did they copy your bad LHP as well?

SEdoll is similar to Sino. One day they'll attempt. 10+ bodies so far, still crap.

seagull · Post by **seagull** » Sun Aug 22, 2021 1:49 am

SEDoll did the initial hard yards of producing these dolls
A significant investment by any measure

Regardless of our opinions about the design, it is still theft and not supported by TDF's position on counterfeit dolls

PDutus · Post by **PDutus** » Sun Aug 22, 2021 9:15 am

esquisseallure wrote:
Siliconeman wrote:Did they copy your bad LHP as well?
SEdoll is similar to Sino. One day they'll attempt. 10+ bodies so far, still crap.

Not the best, I would agree, in most of their dolls as far as I can see, although the revised 167 seems to be a lot better. Which is a shame, especially for those for whom correct LHP is paramount (not me), as they have some lovely sculpts.

What would worry me far more is the quality of the skeleton, how consistent the joint tightness is and how quickly the joints are likely to loosen (SE are made in a Jinsan factory, which is NOT a good start as far as the skeleton is concerned).

But to get back on topic, I absolutely second what seagull said about theft!!

Mr Consistency · Post by **Mr Consistency** » Sun Aug 22, 2021 10:40 am

PDutus wrote:
esquisseallure wrote:
Siliconeman wrote:Did they copy your bad LHP as well?
SEdoll is similar to Sino. One day they'll attempt. 10+ bodies so far, still crap.
Not the best, I would agree, in most of their dolls as far as I can see, although the revised 167 seems to be a lot better. Which is a shame, especially for those for whom correct LHP is paramount (not me), as they have some lovely sculpts.

What would worry me far more is the quality of the skeleton, how consistent the joint tightness is and how quickly the joints are likely to loosen (SE are made in a Jinsan factory, which is NOT a good start as far as the skeleton is concerned).

But to get back on topic, I absolutely second what seagull said about theft!!

The question that comes to my mind about that is while SE and WM may share space in the same factory, are their mixes of TPE and mold making and such coming from the same source? Or, is SE making their own material completely independent, and simply operating in the same building? Either can be the case.

Anyway, end of tangent.

I don't mind if Company A buys a bunch of heads from Company B to use on their dolls. That's a business transaction. That does not seem to be the case here. From the involved web page, "We are not only an online shop but also a leading sex doll manufacturer located in China." Really? So which of these dolls do you actually manufacture? I don't see anything new here.

TDF_Management · Post by **TDF_Management** » Sun Aug 22, 2021 10:54 am

Please understand that theft of intellectual property is a serious crime. Intellectual Property includes the original manufacturers' costly Research and Development as well as the artistic design by the sculptor.

TDF Management supports the fight against counterfeit dolls, we don't allow any promotion for counterfeiters, see viewtopic.php?f=80&t=130563