Thigh girth on 160, please

elyx · Post by **elyx** » Wed Dec 02, 2020 7:02 pm

Can someone please post here the thigh girth on the 160A, 160, 160 Nanoka and 160 Maria models?

Thank you.

Jack+Sanhui · Post by **Jack+Sanhui** » Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:46 pm

the thigh girth
160cm 45cm（all）
only 160cm Nanoka 47cm

serge · Post by **serge** » Thu Dec 03, 2020 3:24 am

elyx wrote:Can someone please post here the thigh girth on the 160A, 160, 160 Nanoka and 160 Maria models?

Thank you.

45 on a Marya model !!

elyx · Post by **elyx** » Thu Dec 03, 2020 3:50 am

Jack+Sanhui wrote:the thigh girth
160cm 45cm（all）
only 160cm Nanoka 47cm

Thank you.

Do you have any plans for producing a skinny girl with an A cup size, 50 in waist, 75 in hips, 44 in thigh girth and 165+ in height?
Similar to 160A, but smaller hips and taller.

Jack+Sanhui · Post by **Jack+Sanhui** » Thu Dec 03, 2020 9:41 am

elyx wrote:
Jack+Sanhui wrote:the thigh girth
160cm 45cm（all）
only 160cm Nanoka 47cm
Thank you.

Do you have any plans for producing a skinny girl with an A cup size, 50 in waist, 75 in hips, 44 in thigh girth and 165+ in height?
Similar to 160A, but smaller hips and taller.

We have no plan for the moment. 160A is not short.

wynncamp52 · Post by **wynncamp52** » Sun Dec 06, 2020 12:52 am

Jack+Sanhui wrote:
elyx wrote:
Jack+Sanhui wrote:the thigh girth
160cm 45cm（all）
only 160cm Nanoka 47cm
Thank you.

Do you have any plans for producing a skinny girl with an A cup size, 50 in waist, 75 in hips, 44 in thigh girth and 165+ in height?
Similar to 160A, but smaller hips and taller.
We have no plan for the moment. 160A is not short.

Jack, do you have any pics, both front and back, of both of the 160 non AIO dolls? I have photos of the old larger breast sculpt and was just wondering if there have been any improvements. I also haven't seen any good photos of the 160 small breast doll from behind, yet. In the photo you just posted displaying all 4 of the 160 Sanhui dolls in a line up the larger breasted 160 non AIO seems to look better than it use to. Am I just seeing things?

elyx · Post by **elyx** » Sun Dec 06, 2020 5:27 am

wynncamp52 wrote:I also haven't seen any good photos of the 160 small breast doll from behind, yet.

160A

Jack+Sanhui · Post by **Jack+Sanhui** » Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:56 am

wynncamp52 wrote:
Jack+Sanhui wrote:
elyx wrote:
Jack+Sanhui wrote:the thigh girth
160cm 45cm（all）
only 160cm Nanoka 47cm
Thank you.

Do you have any plans for producing a skinny girl with an A cup size, 50 in waist, 75 in hips, 44 in thigh girth and 165+ in height?
Similar to 160A, but smaller hips and taller.
We have no plan for the moment. 160A is not short.
Jack, do you have any pics, both front and back, of both of the 160 non AIO dolls? I have photos of the old larger breast sculpt and was just wondering if there have been any improvements. I also haven't seen any good photos of the 160 small breast doll from behind, yet. In the photo you just posted displaying all 4 of the 160 Sanhui dolls in a line up the larger breasted 160 non AIO seems to look better than it use to. Am I just seeing things?

OK Let me see！

: 160大胸背面.jpg (1005.09 KiB) Viewed 898 times

: 160大胸右边.jpg (980.78 KiB) Viewed 898 times

: 160大胸正面.jpg (917.8 KiB) Viewed 898 times

: 160大胸正面侧.jpg (962.52 KiB) Viewed 898 times

This is a live shot of 160 big breasts, which I shot last year.

wynncamp52 · Post by **wynncamp52** » Sun Dec 06, 2020 1:57 pm

elyx wrote:
wynncamp52 wrote:I also haven't seen any good photos of the 160 small breast doll from behind, yet.
160A

Thanks Jack! These look great! The jury's still out, concerning the 160A, as to my interest level, so the more pics I can find, the more it helps. How close is the 160A sculpt to the 160?

Jack+Sanhui · Post by **Jack+Sanhui** » Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:52 pm

wynncamp52 wrote:
elyx wrote:
wynncamp52 wrote:I also haven't seen any good photos of the 160 small breast doll from behind, yet.
160A
Thanks Jack! These look great! The jury's still out, concerning the 160A, as to my interest level, so the more pics I can find, the more it helps. How close is the 160A sculpt to the 160?

This is 160A

: 160小胸背面.jpg (919.29 KiB) Viewed 841 times

: 160小胸正面.jpg (1.03 MiB) Viewed 841 times

: 160小胸右边.jpg (901.65 KiB) Viewed 841 times

: 160小胸正面侧.jpg (748.87 KiB) Viewed 841 times

Enjoy！

elyx · Post by **elyx** » Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:00 am

Thank you Jack for providing us with these images. Visually it looks like 160 and 160A are identical and I think the slight different measurements are because usually they do differ slightly even from doll to doll of the same model.

Are all these images taken with full option models (soft thighs, soft belly, etc)?
If so then would the inner thighs be a little thinner if the soft thighs option is not added?

Jack+Sanhui · Post by **Jack+Sanhui** » Mon Dec 07, 2020 6:46 am

There is no difference in the appearance of soft options, only in the feel.

wynncamp52 · Post by **wynncamp52** » Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:16 am

elyx wrote:Thank you Jack for providing us with these images. Visually it looks like 160 and 160A are identical and I think the slight different measurements are because usually they do differ slightly even from doll to doll of the same model.

Are all these images taken with full option models (soft thighs, soft belly, etc)?
If so then would the inner thighs be a little thinner if the soft thighs option is not added?

The implants do not change the measurements, or rather: All measurements are final following implant upgrades.

Jack: Thanks for these photos. The differences between these two bodies are subtle, but apparent. Although I love a small breast over a large one, in this case, for me, the choice is the 160 over the 160A. I like the 160's waist to hip ratio better.

elyx · Post by **elyx** » Mon Dec 07, 2020 8:00 am

wynncamp52 wrote:Although I love a small breast over a large one, in this case, for me, the choice is the 160 over the 160A. I like the 160's waist to hip ratio better.

The waist is identical (48cm) and as for the hips the difference is 1cm.
The only one that has a bigger waist (53cm) is the AIO Nanoka and I would prefer the 53cm waist on the 160A too.

wynncamp52 · Post by **wynncamp52** » Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:43 am

You're absolutely right. I guess when I say "ratio" I am talking about contour. I like the contour between the hips and the waist better on the 160. Visually, to me, measurements aside, I find her more appealing. Also, the butt on the 160A is different. The molding, the sculpt, is what I tend to consider over measurements, and the sculpt differs just enough. When it comes to detail, no two sculpts are identical.

Getting off subject just a tad, but not really: I also tend to be put off by sculpts where the contours are less smooth. For instance, when comparing the Nanoka 160 AIO to the new 161, the AIO has more abruptly angled contours on the hips than the 161. The 161 has smoother segway from butt, to hip, then to waist. The measurements are similar, yet the sculpts are distinctly individual. It may seem a little obsessive of me, to some, but we are talking about a several thousand dollar investment, after all. Besides, I love the art form of the doll making, the creation process. I find life-like dolls fascinating. The technical aspects, for me, don't factor in until it comes down to durability and functionality. Still...that's an art unto itself.