Or, a torso version, which should be a standard option for every doll. The number of people who've recently shared their hesitation to buy a doll because they have no room to store it (or store it discreetly) is eye-opening.acrux wrote:Agree 100%. And I'd gladly pay a good deal extra for a doll looking like this and weighing 50 lbs.Gundam wrote:I don't have a problem with the look of her boobs at all. While huge, they look very nice too me. At least they're not pointing straight forward like some of the more phoney boobs. I am way more concerned with the weight! 170 with this build, I am assuming well over 80 lbs, like even 100 lbs or more!!!
I really don't want anything over 60 lbs and prefer much lighter. If they make a foam version that weighed say 30-40 lbs, I would like it much better!
Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
*My juicy Cherry: viewtopic.php?t=154759
*Z-cup Moira: viewtopic.php?t=138543
*BBW Breanna: viewtopic.php?t=143116
*Yulia: viewtopic.php?t=122950
*Tina viewtopic.php?t=121819
*Aurora Jolie: viewtopic.php?t=106838
*World-famous Una Carha: viewtopic.php?t=93292
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 3:02 pm
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
Why use cheap metal that's heavy? With the engineering and composite technology around today it must be easy to use a lightweight, high strength material?bobhenry wrote:it only makes sense that taller dolls will weight morejames 1966 wrote:Lord...90+ lbs....well, the doll makers sure as hell aren't listening to me...I'm so sad , all these voluptuous dolls and they're so ridiculously heavy. Oh well, I can still admire the pictures.
more material, more metal.
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
Yes, or better still, a modular doll like DS' Ex-Lite, but with the connecting pins attached to the limbs instead of to the torso. Orderable with or without limbs, or limbs later. Imagine a 60-75 lbs doll, too heavy for many or too big for their storage space, divided into a 40-55 lbs torso and 20 lbs of limbs. (And I'd pay plenty extra for that too).CF wrote:Or, a torso version, which should be a standard option for every doll. The number of people who've recently shared their hesitation to buy a doll because they have no room to store it (or store it discreetly) is eye-opening.acrux wrote:Agree 100%. And I'd gladly pay a good deal extra for a doll looking like this and weighing 50 lbs.Gundam wrote:I don't have a problem with the look of her boobs at all. While huge, they look very nice too me. At least they're not pointing straight forward like some of the more phoney boobs. I am way more concerned with the weight! 170 with this build, I am assuming well over 80 lbs, like even 100 lbs or more!!!
I really don't want anything over 60 lbs and prefer much lighter. If they make a foam version that weighed say 30-40 lbs, I would like it much better!
-
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 567
- Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 1:58 pm
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
-
- Contributing Poster
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:25 pm
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
Too large/heavy for me though. A shorter version could work though. Or a bust.
- Dollyworld
- Active Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:41 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
CF wrote:Or, a torso version, which should be a standard option for every doll. The number of people who've recently shared their hesitation to buy a doll because they have no room to store it (or store it discreetly) is eye-opening.acrux wrote:Agree 100%. And I'd gladly pay a good deal extra for a doll looking like this and weighing 50 lbs.Gundam wrote:I don't have a problem with the look of her boobs at all. While huge, they look very nice too me. At least they're not pointing straight forward like some of the more phoney boobs. I am way more concerned with the weight! 170 with this build, I am assuming well over 80 lbs, like even 100 lbs or more!!!
I really don't want anything over 60 lbs and prefer much lighter. If they make a foam version that weighed say 30-40 lbs, I would like it much better!
I agree, a torso option would be an excellent idea for all doll manufactures making these big breasted beauties. Even though they are gorgeous I don't want to carry that amount of weight around or find storage areas. The first doll manufacture that makes a huge boob torso will get my money and I'll buy another from the next manufacture that comes out with their torso.
WM Torso M-Cup - Sold April 2022
OR Doll 156cm H-cup - Sold Jun 2017
Ruby 13 Torso - Sold May 2017
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 23824
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
How large are you talking?
Is the YL 160 large enough?
You can see a video of her how nice her knockers below from a great TDF vendor( for some reason the one on vimeo got removed):
Love,
the BCD Girls
- Dollyworld
- Active Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:41 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
Yes, I'm referring to the YL150cm. WM's 170cm M-cup and Passion Dolls 158cm big boob dolls. They are all beautiful and I just love those big boobs but I wish those manufactures would offer their dolls in a torso model.Booty Call Dolls wrote:Dollyworld,
How large are you talking?
Is the YL 160 large enough?
You can see a video of her how nice her knockers below from a great TDF vendor( for some reason the one on vimeo got removed):
Love,
the BCD Girls
WM Torso M-Cup - Sold April 2022
OR Doll 156cm H-cup - Sold Jun 2017
Ruby 13 Torso - Sold May 2017
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
- abracadabra
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 892
- Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2016 5:56 am
- Location: anywhere within reason
- Contact:
Re: Another gorgeous WM doll...170 M cup
"f#ck the G-ride, I want the machines that are making em."