The comparison of doll size
- dolls-castle
- Manufacturer
- Posts: 3693
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2016 2:57 am
- Location: Zhongshan, GuangDong, China, 528400
- Contact:
Re: The comparison of doll size
We will do more photos next week..
How about the two legs? Anybody likes them? Any comments?
Miracle
Email: allum@dolls-castle.com
Re: The comparison of doll size
Other height comparison, with heels on ?
Re: The comparison of doll size
dollguy wrote:175 is all legs. Now her is the issue doll manufacturers don't seem to understand when making dolls. Mainly when it comes to buillding taller/larger dolls,they are not balanced. The 175 in picture looks like tits on a stick. Maybe people buy it? And i am the minority in my view?
As pointed out as well,the vagina distance is no difference with 10cm of height difference. Is it laziness or intentionally made that way?
I don't mean to sound critical, some people are not aware of some details or overlook it. I think manufacturers should start doing more surveys and ask questions. Instead of just producing hit or miss dolls. Nobody that i know would want a lady with toothpick legs real or doll.
I recently bought the 166cm muscular workout jy doll. To me,she was the most balanced doll on the market. Building a doll with stick legs is not very well received or sold. Put some meat on her,a person buying that big of a doll isnt worried about weight as much as someone buying a 140cm doll.
My last bit of advice! Don't worry if a doll is 100lbs. A person buying tbat is looking for something more lifelike balanced weight and body sized to fit her shape. Everyone is going crazy of the LeAnne doll right now. Why? Cause it is balanced sized wise for a big girl. Nobody wants a stick lady.
Sorry if i offend anyone,just my opinion.
dollguy wrote:Here is a good example, one weight is balanced. While the other is all legs.
Yeeeeeeeeesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
Thanks for the comparison photos miracle! I wish every manufacturer would do this!
- Rock13
- Super Moderator
- Posts: 8118
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2018 6:19 pm
- Location: Big Sky Country
- Contact:
Re: The comparison of doll size
Link to Hadleigh's photo thread
Link to Harper's photo thread
Link to Kendall's photo thread
Link to the H2K Ranch
- hollows+fentiman
- Doll Oracle
- Posts: 8640
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 4:13 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: The comparison of doll size
If you have any, I suggest you pm Miracle at DollsCastle.
Cheers, Hollows.
Tanice & Jacey WM168A (Lovedolls Grace Williams & #64 heads)
Vivette 153 Vivid Doll
Rosheen WM 156B
Tarni Kimber Doll
Rusty Firedoll 166
Chiyoko 6YE 170
Reema Piperdoll 162
ETesse PIB Spinner 2.0 silicone
Yi nu de & Yong DS100
Many Phicen, Jiaou, LD, Barbie and Ken Dolls!
Re: The comparison of doll size
- avante
- Doll Mentor
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 11:23 am
- Location: Holland - the Netherlands
- Contact:
Re: The comparison of doll size
Truth been told for me the perfect one would be between the 165 and the 160; the first being a tat skinny; as common with dolls (and mentioned before) in the legs mostly*, and the latter being to fat for me...it's really curious to me how these are about the choices: skinny kinda average girl (with decent tits) or a extreme curvy tits/ ass&hips/ fat overall...like where is the medium / normal size? Not that many in betweens imo unfort.
*it always amazes me how no company seems so get the bright idea to pretty much keep this kinda body but just add some (like not x2 but x1.2-1.5) meat to the legs and like calfs...add like 2-5kg and it's a real proper build. Maybe I'm just overseeing something here
But really probs to Dolls Castle for at least posting these!
My doll experience : WM 158D tales & pics: viewtopic.php?f=215&t=85063&start=465