I KNOW RIGHT!!Buick225 wrote:What a time to be alive in the doll world! It is becoming very hard to pick a favorite. Another very nice doll on the market from WM.
WM 170cm M cup new doll
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Follow the dolls on Xvideos:
And on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/bombshellbarbiedollz/
https://www.instagram.com/shantaedoll69/
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
I didn't see this until you pointed it out. Probably much more noticeable if the areola weren't so dark.FiveByFive wrote:Closer scrutiny reveals that they apparently added a...trench?...between the center of the areolas and the actual nips.
This is disappointing. WM Dolls got the areola mostly right with the 155DD (just too small), right twice with the 165K, in both the regular and larger nipple molds, and right again with the 141F and 158H, yet have managed to mess it up with both of these 170s.
Go back to what we had on the 165Ks, 141F, and 158H, add some bumps to simulate Montgomery's glands, then stop messing with it on the large breasted models.
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
I agree.JunkGuy wrote:I didn't see this until you pointed it out. Probably much more noticeable if the areola weren't so dark.FiveByFive wrote:Closer scrutiny reveals that they apparently added a...trench?...between the center of the areolas and the actual nips.
This is disappointing. WM Dolls got the areola mostly right with the 155DD (just too small), right twice with the 165K, in both the regular and larger nipple molds, and right again with the 141F and 158H, yet have managed to mess it up with both of these 170s.
Go back to what we had on the 165Ks, 141F, and 158H, add some bumps to simulate Montgomery's glands, then stop messing with it on the large breasted models.
- subcom117
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: In a K-Cup dream
- Contact:
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
JunkGuy wrote:I didn't see this until you pointed it out. Probably much more noticeable if the areola weren't so dark.FiveByFive wrote:Closer scrutiny reveals that they apparently added a...trench?...between the center of the areolas and the actual nips.
This is disappointing. WM Dolls got the areola mostly right with the 155DD (just too small), right twice with the 165K, in both the regular and larger nipple molds, and right again with the 141F and 158H, yet have managed to mess it up with both of these 170s.
Go back to what we had on the 165Ks, 141F, and 158H, add some bumps to simulate Montgomery's glands, then stop messing with it on the large breasted models.
- Booty Call Dolls
- VENDOR
- Posts: 23798
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2014 3:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Contact your TDF vendor of choice
Jeff and the BCD Girls
"We turn dreams into reality"
I'm only dreaming right? You just ordered her. I thought this was supposed to be one of those long slow waits Now here today is this lovely face. I can't thank you enough. My dreams are never this fufilling.I've been happy and relaxed, knowing she would someday exist. Now that I see her I am jubilant.With respect and admiration for what you do so well,
BCD has been amazing! As close to bespoke as you're going to get with TPE, it's almost like getting prescription haha! Thorough, sensitive to your needs and limitations, friendly and thoughtful. Flashy websites are no match for a Jeff's one on one service.
- Peonyou101
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 827
- Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 12:00 am
- Location: California, USA
- Contact:
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
They aren't. The ones with areola made to look like pasties (like the earlier WM170) just make it appear this is so.subcom117 wrote:I guess the nipple/areola is added after the mold process
-
- Active Member
- Posts: 195
- Joined: Tue Mar 10, 2015 10:05 pm
- Contact:
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
I'm in total agreementharemlover wrote:A B or C cup version of this doll would be an incredibly realistic figure
Best wishes
Harem
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
Anyway , My frustration is these H,M cup dolls are fabulous, but they are on Huge Dolls,
To CF point, why have they not made a Torso doll with these proportions? And the larger your making those fabulous boobs, your making momma heavy.
You know how many Latinas women- especially southern Cali-- that are super short at 4-5" -5' that have Massive boobs?
There is nothing wrong with going back to the drawing board and making the shorter/Lighter, H-class boob.
Frankly it will light up CF, and you would get more movment on dolls. I think that is the big hole in the market right now. 130-140cm with Hcup
Estelle 3.0 viewtopic.php?t=163825
Estelle 2.0 viewtopic.php?f=11&t=114588
Anaya: WM148cm https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=97057
Estelle JY142cm https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=82971
More Estelle https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=83865
Fishface SY158cm : https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=83864
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
I'm not interested in torsos myself, but I'm coming around to supporting you guys on this. Have they announced how heavy this doll is yet? It looks to be at least 40kg (88lb) That's not a problem for someone like me but its diminishing returns - the heavier and taller it gets the progressively fewer buyers can handle it. Unless there's some magic walking technology on the horizon or a much lighter skeleton in the works, producers are going to have to figure out a way to balance weight vs bustiness. I mean, what's next? A 175cm T-cup weighing over 45kb/100lb? The YL150 tried to go short to shave weight but its fat hips make it just as heavy as the WM165K. I think you guys are absolutely right that its time for a huge breasted model in the 25kg/55lb or less range, even if it means dropping the legs (and arms if needed)EBmoist wrote:To CF point, why have they not made a Torso doll with these proportions? And the larger your making those fabulous boobs, your making momma heavy.
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
I dont think dropping legs or arms,, its just being ok with " the short girl " who got teased thru high school, who had a rack far ahead of her age!JunkGuy wrote:I think you guys are absolutely right that its time for a huge breasted model in the 25kg/55lb or less range, even if it means dropping the legs (and arms if needed)EBmoist wrote:To CF point, why have they not made a Torso doll with these proportions? And the larger your making those fabulous boobs, your making momma heavy.
With Devildoc idea of air filled boobs , or hey !! what about air filled pockets in the ass as well?? why cant someone build a doll that would have the valves that you could inflate the breast/ass to teh size you want? there you go!
Estelle 3.0 viewtopic.php?t=163825
Estelle 2.0 viewtopic.php?f=11&t=114588
Anaya: WM148cm https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=97057
Estelle JY142cm https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=82971
More Estelle https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=83865
Fishface SY158cm : https://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtop ... 11&t=83864
- subcom117
- Doll Advisor
- Posts: 668
- Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 12:00 am
- Location: In a K-Cup dream
- Contact:
Re: WM 170cm M cup new doll
JunkGuy wrote:The YL150 tried to go short to shave weight but its fat hips make it just as heavy as the WM165K. I think you guys are absolutely right that its time for a huge breasted model in the 25kg/55lb or less range, even if it means dropping the legs (and arms if needed)