Intro / 163 cm WM ordered from sexyrealsexdolls.com

Dollerson · Post by **Dollerson** » Mon May 02, 2016 12:41 am

Dear Fellow Enthusiasts,

Allow this to serve as my introduction:

I promised myself several months ago while in a rare sober moment amidst the rapture of the best relationship of my life (featuring by far the most enthralling sex I've ever had) that if it failed for any reason I would need to treat myself to a doll to cope with the loss. Alas, life has taken that dreadful course and a new 163cm WM Doll is now in production accordingly to bring me some much-needed cheer, and for nostalgia of my former partner's [similar] incredible and dearly missed proportions.

I've taken the plunge in ordering from the "new" vendor sexyrealsexdolls.com ("SRSD") following confirmation elsewhere on the board from the WM Dolls account that they are a legitimate reseller. I received a very competitive price following a 15% promo and have been in constant communication with customer service via email thus far for some minor customizations and order details. My order, placed in the evening 5/1 ET is :

163 cm WM doll in pale skin tone
Heads 38, 45 and 56 each with brown eyes and removable tongue customization

This thread will not likely be a photographic shrine for my girl(s) but is rather designed to honestly account my experience with this vendor for others' benefit. Nonetheless of course I won't let them go unseen for those who may also be considering the 163.

Finally, if there is any interest I have some photos of and experience with what I like to call "ghetto-ass" mannequin mods which I may post in the appropriate subforum....

Best to all,

Dollerson

Post by **MySiliconeLoveDoll** » Mon May 02, 2016 6:19 am

Welcome to the forum!

DollAfficionado · Post by **DollAfficionado** » Mon May 02, 2016 7:47 am

Welcome to TDF!

james 1966 · Post by **james 1966** » Mon May 02, 2016 2:38 pm

Welcome to the forum...I am currently straddling the fence between the classic curves of the 163cm and the outlandish proportions of the 165cm K-cup (both WM) dolls. With complaints of TPE odor on the decline, I'm assuming that that has been somewhat addressed by the company or the odor dissipates in a relatively short time. I finally have the money to actually order either of these dolls right this second if I want. It's really been entertaining ''window shopping'' for the last year. I'm so torn between these 2, I could literally flip a coin. I love the enormous tits of the 165cm but the slender hips and super-skinny legs are a disappointment. The 163cm has those classic 'Playboy Bunny' dimensions that never go out of style. Great hips and legs on that doll. I know I'm rambling a bit here but I haven't seen anyone mention ordering the 163cm in a while and it got me wanting to put my quandary in writing. Thanks for listening.

Miamivice · Post by **Miamivice** » Mon May 02, 2016 3:28 pm

Any updates? I was hoping to go for a 163cm but I'm on the fence between 163cm or 165cm. I want the most realistic body. I heard the 165 is like a skinny asian, but I wonder if it's too skinny. 163 looks a little more realistic body in the photos. She's still pretty skinny I assume?

Dollerson · Post by **Dollerson** » Tue May 03, 2016 12:54 pm

First, thank you DollAfficionado, MySiliconeLoveDoll and James 1966 for the welcome

Dear James and Miamivice:

I was in a nearly identical position deliberating endlessly between the 163 and the 165 (that is, the non-mega-tits 165, which appears to have the same proportions as mega-tits aside from bust). For me, as this has been more about attempting to replicate the proportions of a particular real woman, my dilemma was a bit unique (though I admit both the 163 and 165 have a bit more in the bust than she does, ha). The hip-to-waist ratio was more accurate on the 165 (.688) but size was too narrow overall, especially the 21 inch waist; the upper thighs of 163 had a slight bit more than my ex but the legs of the 165 were probably too slim in general. I would not say the 165 is totally unrealistic as I've been with a Japanese gal or two with nearly such a slender build, but your odds of finding either 165 version's rack on those general proportions are nearly impossible in the wild. If you find her though, please give her my contact info, ha.

Let me know if there are any particular angles of the 163 which you'd like to see for the purposes of deciding but haven't found in previous research and I'll do my best to provide them once I receive her.

Dollerson

dominator4455 · Post by **dominator4455** » Tue May 03, 2016 9:22 pm

Congrats! keep us posted!

Miamivice · Post by **Miamivice** » Thu May 05, 2016 4:32 pm

Thanks Dollerson. I would love to see some pics when you get her. Did they give you an estimate on when? I am curious if the C-cup is more realistic but still look like natural big boobs without being over the top. It would be great to see your doll near objects that show her true size. Any angles that look good and show her T&A would be appreciated. Thanks!

Miamivice · Post by **Miamivice** » Thu May 05, 2016 4:33 pm

For instance, this thread shows a lot of angles and the 165's butt seems a little odd looking in the pictures towards the end, or is it just me?

http://dollforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=215&t=71644

james 1966 · Post by **james 1966** » Fri May 06, 2016 2:02 am

After much deliberation, I've decided the 163cm is the way to go. I've studied these 2 bodies from every angle and find the 163cm to win the battle in overall sex appeal. I really don't care for the ''baseball bat'' appearance of the legs on the 165cm, nor the narrow hips and shoulders. Not knocking the 165cm, that's just what my eyes see.

DollAfficionado · Post by **DollAfficionado** » Fri May 06, 2016 3:06 am

The 163cm is a great choice as well.

Dollerson · Post by **Dollerson** » Tue May 10, 2016 3:22 am

Ive just been informed that my order is already on its way and Fedex tracking expects a Thursday afternoon delivery, 5/12. That would be an extremely impressive 11 days from order to receipt, inclusive of manufacturing and shipping. Looking forward to providing my next update with doll in hand.

By the way, the new 161 WM on the sexyrealsexdolls site has me nearly reaching for my wallet already for order #2. She has a very similar look on top to the DollHouse168 161-plus, but with more realistic waist/hip sizing and perhaps a bit more booty. Damn, WM, you've outdone yourselves again.

Post by **Pippa** » Tue May 10, 2016 1:08 pm

CONGRATULATIONS and WELCOME!

My man tells me that I'm a wonderful lady to take to bed and he says that my old size, 163, is one of the best there are. He still likes me after I put on a little weight at Christmas, but my longer legs were better for him spooning with me from behind. He fell in love with me the minute he first clapt eyes upon me http://www.dollforum.com/forum/viewtopi ... 15&t=55178 . . .

Love and kisses,

Pippa xx

Dollerson · Post by **Dollerson** » Wed May 11, 2016 9:42 pm

Thank you Pippa! Indeed I had spied photos of you that helped make my decision

Update:
Unfortunately Fedex tracking has been updated for a whopping 5-day delay from scheduled delivery....I was eager to receive her tomorrow but will now have to wait until next Tuesday. That would mean about 16 days from start to finish, which would still be very good if there is no further hold up. It's a bit of a let down but I suppose I shouldn't complain.

Miamivice · Post by **Miamivice** » Wed May 18, 2016 10:15 am

Dollerson wrote:Thank you Pippa! Indeed I had spied photos of you that helped make my decision

Update:
Unfortunately Fedex tracking has been updated for a whopping 5-day delay from scheduled delivery....I was eager to receive her tomorrow but will now have to wait until next Tuesday. That would mean about 16 days from start to finish, which would still be very good if there is no further hold up. It's a bit of a let down but I suppose I shouldn't complain.

Did she arrive??