My new Ex-Lite Doll and thoughts

DKaisaer9 · Post by **DKaisaer9** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 11:59 am

Ordered it on 2016/09/23
Arrived 12/21/2016

so long i kind of lost my anticipation even after i received my email that the doll is about to be shipped...well since its pre-order its can't helped...

Anyways, first of all IS it good doll?
Well its really depends...

for Display Doll its great. Easy to pose, light weight, easy to clothe because of removable joints

for Love Doll? NO.

The concept of modular doll was interesting but to be honest i found it poorly implemented
let me site those problems i encountered while trying to use this doll

This very modular feature that supposed to make this interesting doll also made it annoying to use...
insertion Joints are not well secure and easily to detach ...there is no some sort of mechanism to tighten the insertion joints to prevent those limbs to detach
those insertion portion is too short, especially that register insertion. Its way too short and why is it only 1??

then because this limbs are quite easily to detach, it makes it harder to pose the body especially the feet
when you try to move and pose the lower body, the foot limb keeps detaching and yet you need those foot attached because without them the lower torso is so hard to move...

you can actually tighten those insertion joints by adding some sort of hard straw plastic but this make it hard to detach it which is makes the modular feature senseless...

lets talk about skin of doll

for those planning to use it for display doll, those wrinkles are not much of problem especially if they are clothes
you can even lessen those wrinkles with proper pose
in my case, i dont really care about those wrinkles since i too mostly use it for display and clothed

but for those planning to use it for "play" well
Not so good... since this is made of soft polyurethane foam, unlike silicone it has less "elastic" property..
and without proper elastic property, you cant stretch those body part much or it may tear apart (it happened to me btw)
you need to be delicate on twisting those joints
usually this isnt much of problem as long as ur careful of handling those doll as much of those silicone one
but whenever you plan to play, pose are quite limited and forcing it may tear those skin especially the Vaginal Insertion Area
and probably the most worst part i encountered about this doll is how tight those Vaginal area is...
you want to spread those legs to make some space for your play but u cant because it wont stretch and forcing it, will tear it apart
this forces you to deal with other limited pose for play...

skeleton are so-so not much of range of movement for pose but decent enough imo.

silicone vagina....
i am an asian and you make think of me of those stereotype class but even for me this silicone vagina is way too tight

Despite of all this complain i have... for a price i got it (promotional price) im pretty contented since im already expecting those problem in firsthand and im enjoying using it as Display Doll
I think you better off think of it as Movable Soft Mannequin than Love Doll

there is definitely a plenty of room for improvement and fix
i personally i think instead of polyurethane, they may try the modular Silicone Hybrids
since its already a modular they may as well as drop off some realism in body figure and give it more option to customize

me as a Hobbyist, gave me more motivation to try making my own hybrid doll
because of this doll, its provided lots of information that might help me in designing my doll

thats all...

DKaisaer9 · Post by **DKaisaer9** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:13 pm

DKaisaer9 · Post by **DKaisaer9** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:13 pm

Lika · Post by **Lika** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:23 pm

This what I have been waiting for a very detailed review of the new DS Ex light. Great review and finally get to see how the Insert placement and or ass really looks. I might get this doll in the future hopefully imporveved version at least.

Post by **mi6c** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 12:26 pm

Thanks very much, good information and insight.

All the best.

acrux · Post by **acrux** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:14 pm

Thank you for your review! Definitely some food for thought here - . You are the second one to say that the insert is too tight, but it seems DS recently introduced a new roomier type insert, so let's hope that will make the Ex-Lite a better bedmate. Btw. do you think she can be used without insert (with a female condom)?

Post by **LoneRanger** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 3:24 pm

All I have to say is, If I were going on an Ocean cruise, I would want to take one with me.

LaDollyVita · Post by **LaDollyVita** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 5:05 pm

Yikes! I'm not impressed to put it mildly, but then again, I am not the target demographic for this toy lady.

jibjibjub · Post by **jibjibjub** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 6:05 pm

Thank you for the great review and photos. They really answered a lot of questions I had about that product.

Ghosta · Post by **Ghosta** » Tue Dec 20, 2016 7:18 pm

No comment.

Gonna go for an eye exam tomorrow to make sure I'm seeing correctly.

james 1966 · Post by **james 1966** » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:14 am

LoneRanger wrote:All I have to say is, If I were going on an Ocean cruise, I would want to take one with me.

Is that because you could conceivably use it as a life preserver if the ship should sink? I'm assuming it floats, being made of foam. This doll seems so ill conceived I don't even know where to start. It looks poorly made, it's not attractive, it barely passes as a mannequin much less a sex doll. Sure to become an albatross and the 'Yugo' of sex dolls. Can't believe this doll made it to production. Heavy seam lines, wrinkled skin, limbs fall off while moving...just terrible for a company with such a history of quality dolls. Just my personal opinion. Gets my vote for worst product of the year 2016.

Master Blaster · Post by **Master Blaster** » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:49 am

Freak me. This is a bit disappointing. Thanks for the very good detailed review bro. I'm now dead in my tracks looking at my plan "B".

Not really impressed with the way this looks now.

samara78 · Post by **samara78** » Wed Dec 21, 2016 4:01 am

I rather like her and am going to get her.

DKaisaer9 · Post by **DKaisaer9** » Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:06 am

acrux wrote:Thank you for your review! Definitely some food for thought here - . You are the second one to say that the insert is too tight, but it seems DS recently introduced a new roomier type insert, so let's hope that will make the Ex-Lite a better bedmate. Btw. do you think she can be used without insert (with a female condom)?

the insertion hole is way too wide even for those XXL Black Dudes Swords in porn (lol)
also the back side of hole is skeleton only covered by thin layer of foam or linen (not really sure)
its going to be very comfortable to use a hole without silicone vagina...
and u might even end up damaging the foam in that part...

i think, i wont even dare to try

J_Kezz · Post by **J_Kezz** » Wed Dec 21, 2016 6:55 am

The seams and wrinkled skin don't really bother me; I didn't necessarily get into dolls to seriously entertain the illusion of doing real women (the 160cm anime doll is appealing enough for me, for instance). But the weak limb connections, limited posing, and the vagina awkwardness definitely put me off some. The biggest disappointment for me, however, is the one I knew of from the start: she's just way too petite for my purposes. You'd think they could've actually taken advantage of the lighter materials to make her at least a little fuller figured.

That said, I still think the DS-Lite is a pretty solid concept and I hope DS improves on it. Definitely not a good start, though, and it doesn't bode well for this doll's future

.